| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
cv controlled sequencer/programable switch/analog wavetable |
meridic Common Wiggler
Joined: 08 Dec 2009 Last Visit: 03 Jun 2010 Posts: 209 Location: frozen depths of nowhere
|
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 5:08 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| Quote: | | grant richter's Analog Tracking Generator might be relevant, it uses the 3914: |
When Ian mentioned the 3914 I remembered this circuit and for a moment I thought I reinvented both the 3914 and Grants circuit. Thee are certainly some simularities and overlap in the capabilities of the two, but some differences.
It is a good circuit that I had forgotten about and now have been reminded of twice today. May have some goodies in it on how to elaborate on mine. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
frijitz Common Wiggler
Joined: 31 Aug 2009 Last Visit: 10 Sep 2010
 Posts: 247
|
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:56 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| fonik wrote: | | bargraph drivers came to my mind too, but i did not mention them because i thought one would need to add inverters. aren't the LM3914/15 stages current drains actually? i am not sure if this is the correct term. i mean the stages are normaly high and the active stage would switch to GND. so one would need inverters, right? |
Or ... drive the input with a down ramp?
Ian |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
frijitz Common Wiggler
Joined: 31 Aug 2009 Last Visit: 10 Sep 2010
 Posts: 247
|
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:08 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| wetterberg wrote: | | ... the 10 outs of the lm3914; isn't this just a matter of tying outputs 8-9-10 together? That way when the voltage gets that high, it just turns on the last step, as you would want it. |
Much simpler than that. You can vary the number of output steps by adjusting the relative magnitudes of the input signal and the bias voltage at the top of the comparator ladder.
This is how my 5Pulser waveshaper works.
http://home.comcast.net/~ijfritz/sy_cir8.htm
Ian |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
meridic Common Wiggler
Joined: 08 Dec 2009 Last Visit: 03 Jun 2010 Posts: 209 Location: frozen depths of nowhere
|
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:32 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
After some thought I decided to put off experimenting with the bargraph chips. I am not seeing anything good in the way of off the shelf parity checkers so it would require one rolled from gates. It also lacks a few areas of future exploitation that the original has. Mainly I got an idea of how to alter the ADCs response that I want to play with in the future. For now it will be just expo, but It may go linear, I am on the fence as to which is more useful, or if one is more useful then the other even. I also decided to to dump the adaptive resolution, and went back to my improved input circuit. New features are a clock output and a resolution CV input. The programable switch feature has been scrapped and the 4051 has been flipped for a simpler circuit, I think I tried to make it to useful and was losing some of the ability it had in other areas, and zthee wanted more?
The circuit is mostly drawn up in the computer land, but having to relearn xcircuit has made it slow. I am not going to have time to test it for a few weeks most likely, but I can help troubleshoot any problems for the brave souls who attempt it. For the most part it will work, the majority of the circuit has been tested in one form or another, it just may not work completely as I intended. Not sure if anyone other then myself will be able to notice that though.
Oh, perhaps I should add that hysteris as Ian reccomended as well.
I will get the schematic up in a day or two. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
meridic Common Wiggler
Joined: 08 Dec 2009 Last Visit: 03 Jun 2010 Posts: 209 Location: frozen depths of nowhere
|
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 5:20 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
I have been trying to figure out a simple way to add hysteresis the to ADC but am having no luck coming up with a good simple way to add it to all of them and not individually. Anyone have any ideas?
Best Idea I have had is running the clock output into the resistor chain. I think it might work but not sure, it would not be perfect but perhaps good enough. The pulse should last long enough to get the comparator past the its indecicisive stage to were its state should be an obvious choice by the time the pulse goes low. Perhaps that clock should be inverted as well.
OK, I did it, I reinvented Grants circuit. Well not exactly but I have gotten pretty close to it. I am going to have to think on this abit to decide if mine is worth the time to sort out since there is already a working circuit pretty close to mine out there. Clock output would be nice though which would be tricky on his. I also have a few future Ideas to extend the usefulness of mine which could not be done on his, but that is for a later date when I have more time. But I can also see some tweaks that could be done to his circuit to make it more useful as well.
So what do you all think? Enough difference in my circuit to make it worthwhile to persue further? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Luka Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 15 Jul 2008 Last Visit: 10 Sep 2010
  Posts: 2476 Location: melbourne
| |
| Back to top |
|
 |
the bad producer Wiggling with Experience
Joined: 17 Mar 2009 Last Visit: 10 Sep 2010
 Posts: 443 Location: Hackney
| |
| Back to top |
|
 |
falafelbiels still learning to wiggle
Joined: 04 Aug 2009 Last Visit: 10 Sep 2010
 Posts: 497 Location: Rotterdam Holland
|
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:32 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
O yes please do persue. I'm going to stick that CV->binary addressing in a panel anyway and see what this turns out like. I was planning on several binarily-addressed sequencers anyway and would like as many options for driving them as possible. I had some LM3914 for this for a while but couldn't quite figure out how to use them.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wetterberg Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 24 Jul 2008 Last Visit: 10 Sep 2010
  Posts: 6850 Location: Copenhagen, Denmark.
|
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 5:36 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
PURSUE!
I think we can really rally behind this idea and get creative as a group; the first muff-wiggler forum modules, perhaps? _________________ www.twitter.com/wetterberg
Current Rig (May'10) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
falafelbiels still learning to wiggle
Joined: 04 Aug 2009 Last Visit: 10 Sep 2010
 Posts: 497 Location: Rotterdam Holland
|
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 6:06 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| YES! with free modules for official wigglers!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DGTom Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 19 Aug 2008 Last Visit: 10 Sep 2010
  Posts: 2060 Location: Pt.Adelaide, Sth.Aust.
|
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 6:42 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| wetterberg wrote: | | PURSUE! |
Yes please!! I'm going to try the CV in / comparators with something else I've been tinkering with, but, I really wanna see where you go with this meridic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
meridic Common Wiggler
Joined: 08 Dec 2009 Last Visit: 03 Jun 2010 Posts: 209 Location: frozen depths of nowhere
|
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 3:28 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
I have not worked to much on this the past couple days, spent awhile trying to figure out how to fool the simulator into giving me realistic results on my idea for adding hysteresis, and tried to simplify my improved input circuitry mostly. Did get the clock output circuitry all sorted out though. Still trying to decide between linear or log for the ADC, leaning towards linear though. I have been somewhat preoccupied with the old PAiA 2720 Lowpass and getting a more useful featureful VCF from it these past couple days.
| Quote: | | I think we can really rally behind this idea and get creative as a group; |
Well lets see it then, get creative people!
| Quote: |
I'm going to try the CV in / comparators with something else I've been tinkering with |
As Ian forwarned the circuit does indeed have problems with slowly changing signals especially saw/ramp waves but on any slow continuous waveform. Hysteresis will be a must if you want to use it for slow. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
the bad producer Wiggling with Experience
Joined: 17 Mar 2009 Last Visit: 10 Sep 2010
 Posts: 443 Location: Hackney
| |
| Back to top |
|
 |
meridic Common Wiggler
Joined: 08 Dec 2009 Last Visit: 03 Jun 2010 Posts: 209 Location: frozen depths of nowhere
|
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 7:27 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
It will work as drawn, but I would not build it that way. The circuit has gone through some rework since then and is abit simpler with pulse outs and clock out as well. There are a couple things dealing with the pulse/clock outs that still need to be finalized but other then that the circuit is good to go. It will be awhile before I can run tests, I need to get some fresh 4532s first, but if you want to do the tests I can help you with any troubleshooting that is needed.
I actually ended up changing directions on this and decided to make the sequencer/switch and ADC seperate modules. But those designs have a good ways to go, they are considerably more complex.
If you do want to build the all in one circuit and want to be the guinea pig let me know and I will get you the later schematic and the info about the one potential problem and what you will need to do to fix it if it is a problem. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
meridic Common Wiggler
Joined: 08 Dec 2009 Last Visit: 03 Jun 2010 Posts: 209 Location: frozen depths of nowhere
|
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 10:04 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
The sun was coming up and I did not feel like sleeping so I got the schematic updated. I scrapped bothering with hysteresis since the added complexity did not seem worth the effort. If you want to run the slow slow stuff through this just run it through a sample and hold first. A few things were not calculated due to lack of sleep, the LEDs current limitting resistor and the RC network on the edge detector. Both are easy to tweak if they do not work right. Added a resolution switch for running audio rate through, but the output is still 0-5V, so if you want +-10 you will need to level shift, I got lazy here, perhaps after sleep I will make the output switch as well. Kept the original input circuit, decided to keep things simple.
If the clock output/binary outputs do not operate correctly it will just take a tweak of the 1k/47pF cap on the input of the XORs. The triggers may not be long enough for some things.
Edit; The binary ABC outputs can also be taken from before the XORs for a gate output instead of a trigger if you would like.
Also the switch inputs do not really want to see anything but +V, once again I got lazy here. But as I mentioned in the previous post there is a fancy rendition in the works, but it is a good ways off still, so something to play with for the time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
the bad producer Wiggling with Experience
Joined: 17 Mar 2009 Last Visit: 10 Sep 2010
 Posts: 443 Location: Hackney
| |
| Back to top |
|
 |
meridic Common Wiggler
Joined: 08 Dec 2009 Last Visit: 03 Jun 2010 Posts: 209 Location: frozen depths of nowhere
|
Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:01 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
--Cool, looks like I forgot the 4538 on my order
Perhaps there is a 4532 on your order?
--Is it a switched socket?
It is.
--I'd want to build with bananas you see!
Then if you would like to keep VC Switch functionality you have a choice to make. Unfortunately there seems to be no simple elegant way to accomplish this functionality in the world of bananas. At least comparativly speaking that is,
Honestly I just threw that in for the hell of it since most people use 1/4" or 1/8", I dumped the VC Switch stuff for my own use, an 8 to 1 switch is just not useful to me. I will keep fun things for banana land in the back of my head and see if I can come up with anything special for those of of us that do not use jacks with a ground/switch.
Also, the ADC can be made linear if you are into that sort of thing, Simplest way is to dump the range switch and replace the top 8 resistors in the chain with diodes. More complex way that retains the resolution switchability is to do a linear resistor cheain like those found in the old korg products. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|