| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
voltage to resistance |
felix Loves the manuals!
Joined: 20 Apr 2007 Last Visit: 08 May 2013
      Posts: 3819 Location: San Jose, CA
|
Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 1:54 pm Post subject: voltage to resistance |
 |
|
|
So, other than Vactrols, how would one use voltage to alter resistance? _________________ dress yourself for the public. you now must exit your home and acquire a dental mirror and lubrication!
i recommend a hat, or a helmet. if a helmet, ensure that it is both convincing and unbiased. -citizen mori
http://felixinferious.blogspot.com
http://felixinferious.bandcamp.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dougcl Number 6
Joined: 26 Jul 2008 Last Visit: 20 May 2013
    Posts: 4000 Location: Portland OR
|
Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 1:56 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| Isn't this what transistors do? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
felix Loves the manuals!
Joined: 20 Apr 2007 Last Visit: 08 May 2013
      Posts: 3819 Location: San Jose, CA
|
Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 2:13 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| dougcl wrote: | | Isn't this what transistors do? |
Huh...it appears they do! I thought they were only for amplification and switching, but it looks like they could work for my application too.
I want to have some voltage control over these little CMOS oscillators. Typically, their frequency is controlled by a resistor + capacitor network, and to add any voltage control you would use a vactrol in place of the resistor. I'd like to use something cheaper and potentially more precise, and if the transistor works, that would certainly fit the bill.
Thanks Doug! _________________ dress yourself for the public. you now must exit your home and acquire a dental mirror and lubrication!
i recommend a hat, or a helmet. if a helmet, ensure that it is both convincing and unbiased. -citizen mori
http://felixinferious.blogspot.com
http://felixinferious.bandcamp.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
flight The Plague Bearer
Joined: 03 Oct 2008 Last Visit: 10 May 2013
    Posts: 1199 Location: Seattle, WA, US
|
Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 2:54 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Bipolar transistors are really current-control and have a logarithmic transfer ratio (in/out). They are commonly used for voltage control but have some other drawbacks such as the addition of the base current to the output.
For a more precision application, FET transistors (such as the MPF102 JFET) are better. Some are even specified as Voltage-Controlled Resistors (VCR). Like bipolar transistors, FETs require a bit of calculation (or trial and error) to set up the biasing network to get the exact behavior you are looking for, but they work quite well. They have no base current effects and behave much more like a true resistance. _________________ ~flight
flight(at)flightofharmony(dot)com
http://www.flightofharmony.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wetterberg Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 24 Jul 2008 Last Visit: 16 Mar 2013
    Posts: 7656 Location: Copenhagen, Denmark.
|
Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 3:28 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Hey Flight, I wonder if you, or other brainiac geniuses, could help out in designing like a breadboard layout for this?
A voltage controlled resistor pcb is one of the most useful devices for modding just about any circuit.
- just something simple; an input, a control input and an output... boom. Could probably be laid out more or less based on the datasheet diagrams even? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
flight The Plague Bearer
Joined: 03 Oct 2008 Last Visit: 10 May 2013
    Posts: 1199 Location: Seattle, WA, US
| |
| Back to top |
|
 |
DGTom Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 19 Aug 2008 Last Visit: 25 May 2013
    Posts: 2627 Location: Pt.Adelaide, Sth.Aust.
|
Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 4:24 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Felix,
Take a look at the 2nd schem. posted here;
http://deathlehem.com/php/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=34
Don't worry about tracking, altho I've not played with the dual transistor set-up much, you can also do it with another CMOS chip, the 4007;
Thanks for all the proper info flight! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Luka Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 15 Jul 2008 Last Visit: 25 May 2013
    Posts: 4913 Location: melbourne
|
Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 6:46 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
you can also use ota's like 3080
and transistors in current sink formation _________________ .
.
.
melbourne australia
soundcloud
lastfm
vimeo
wtb:
220/230/240v Broken Dp4
20x20 ghielmetti matrix
taking offers on (melbourne pickup)
revox pr99 mk2
allenheath zed420 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wetterberg Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 24 Jul 2008 Last Visit: 16 Mar 2013
    Posts: 7656 Location: Copenhagen, Denmark.
|
Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 7:01 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
@flight: Most of those FETs are obsolete... I found one of them for like 20usd...
@DGtom... I've never seen a schematic like that... ever. What chip is that? Are those the pins of the 4007? I assume you're talking about the CD4007? I'd love to see a "proper" schematic for it...
@Luka I'm sorry, but I at least am going to need a little more than the mention of a methodology for doing this...
Could we n00bify this thread a bit? Cheers much  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
panda30y Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 22 Jan 2009 Last Visit: 25 May 2013
    Posts: 1393 Location: Detroit
|
Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 7:36 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| Wow, great thread for us DIY'ers. Thanks for the info everyone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Luka Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 15 Jul 2008 Last Visit: 25 May 2013
    Posts: 4913 Location: melbourne
| |
| Back to top |
|
 |
felix Loves the manuals!
Joined: 20 Apr 2007 Last Visit: 08 May 2013
      Posts: 3819 Location: San Jose, CA
|
Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:09 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Wow, cheers guys! Lots of useful stuff here! _________________ dress yourself for the public. you now must exit your home and acquire a dental mirror and lubrication!
i recommend a hat, or a helmet. if a helmet, ensure that it is both convincing and unbiased. -citizen mori
http://felixinferious.blogspot.com
http://felixinferious.bandcamp.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
flight The Plague Bearer
Joined: 03 Oct 2008 Last Visit: 10 May 2013
    Posts: 1199 Location: Seattle, WA, US
|
Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:12 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
@ wetterberg:
Aside from the VCR-specific FETs, general-purpose FETs will work as replacements. Like the aforementioned MPF102.
<edited> 'cause it needed it...  _________________ ~flight
flight(at)flightofharmony(dot)com
http://www.flightofharmony.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
flight The Plague Bearer
Joined: 03 Oct 2008 Last Visit: 10 May 2013
    Posts: 1199 Location: Seattle, WA, US
|
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 10:21 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
I was too tired last night to go into any detail, so here's a bit more:
There are thousands of different transistors, bipolar and FET, and they go in and out of production on a regular basis. Many of them exist because some manufacturer wants a specific set of properties and orders a custom run (this is often due to military projects). Afterwards, the semiconductor company now has the dies and setup so they do runs of the unit to see if there is any demand. If there is, it stays as a product line. If not, it is discontinued.
Other times, a part is discontinued because of advances in manufacturing processes, sometimes re-appearing under a different part number.
Parts that are successful and not patented in time are subsequently cloned by other manufacturers, often under the same part number but also under a different part number that conforms to regional standards - hence the various prefixes such as: 2N, BC, MPF, etc..
So, when using any schematic that is more than a couple years old, you will often come across transistors that are obsolete. You then just need to find the specs for that part and select a replacement unit that has the same or similar. Since transistors usually require a biasing network of some kind, the specs aren't too restrictive. You will just need to play with the bias component values a bit. _________________ ~flight
flight(at)flightofharmony(dot)com
http://www.flightofharmony.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DGTom Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 19 Aug 2008 Last Visit: 25 May 2013
    Posts: 2627 Location: Pt.Adelaide, Sth.Aust.
|
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 3:52 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| wetterberg wrote: | @DGtom... I've never seen a schematic like that... ever. What chip is that? Are those the pins of the 4007? I assume you're talking about the CD4007? I'd love to see a "proper" schematic for it...  |
Its just a snippet really, fairly transportable. If you replace the 2N3904 in the synthmonger 'Simple VCO' schem it'll work, differant to the transistor, but, it'll work.
Likewise if you just bolt that onto the front of a Collins-esque 40106 oscillator it will give you VC, I'd stick a diode in front - CD4007 doesn't like negative V's much.
I think there is a way to CV a 40106 with a 4016 switch as well, but I've not had that on the breadboard, my first few modules are starting to be built so I'll have to pick up where I left that soon.
I got this to work w/ the CD4007 as well;
[img]http://hackadaycom.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/lfo.png?w=451&h=68 6[/img]
Just wired the pins as per the 4007 datasheet IIRC. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Navs Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 18 Sep 2009 Last Visit: 22 May 2013
   Posts: 1849 Location: Berlin, Germany
| |
| Back to top |
|
 |
frijitz Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 31 Aug 2009 Last Visit: 25 May 2013
   Posts: 1086
|
Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 3:15 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| wetterberg wrote: | @Luka I'm sorry, but I at least am going to need a little more than the mention of a methodology for doing this...  |
It's in the data sheet.
Ian |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
diablojoy Veteran Wiggler
Joined: 22 Jan 2010 Last Visit: 25 May 2013
   Posts: 519 Location: melbourne
|
Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 3:54 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| Quote: | | I've breadboarded an all-pass filter which I'd like to VC at audio rates (i.e. vactrols out of the running): |
check the MFOS site look in the section for WSG mods
there's an easy VC jfet cct there you can try _________________ "its not my fault you employ muppets" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Navs Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 18 Sep 2009 Last Visit: 22 May 2013
   Posts: 1849 Location: Berlin, Germany
| |
| Back to top |
|
 |
Navs Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 18 Sep 2009 Last Visit: 22 May 2013
   Posts: 1849 Location: Berlin, Germany
| |
| Back to top |
|
 |
DGTom Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 19 Aug 2008 Last Visit: 25 May 2013
    Posts: 2627 Location: Pt.Adelaide, Sth.Aust.
|
Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 9:58 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Navs, have you seen Neil Johnsons All Pass?
http://www.milton.arachsys.com/nj71/index.php?menu=2&submenu=0&subsubm enu=3
I'd bet the 2164 will be alot cleaner & easier than a FET.
In my experiance starting with something that sounds the way you want & adding VC can be a PITA, better to start with something that is VC'able & get it to sound the way you want. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Navs Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 18 Sep 2009 Last Visit: 22 May 2013
   Posts: 1849 Location: Berlin, Germany
| |
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dr. Sketch-n-Etch Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 21 Jan 2010 Last Visit: 25 May 2013
   Posts: 2583 Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 11:24 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
I use the 2164 quad exponential VCA almost exclusively as a voltage-control element. It takes a current in (at virtual ground) and attenuates it (with positive voltages) or amplifies it (with negative voltages) depending on the voltage at the control pin. Hence, the ratio between input and output current is determined by a voltage. It is a "voltage-controlled current source" -- in other words, a voltage-controlled resistor.
2164 VCAs must terminate to virtual ground, which means that you must feed each 2164 VCA into the inverting terminal of an opamp with its positive terminal grounded. An opamp wired as an inverter with a resistor in the feedback loop, but with no input resistor, is a "current-to-voltage" converter, and this is what typically follows a 2164 VCA. However, you can also put a capacitor in the feedback loop of the opamp, and now you have an integrator. 2164 + resettable integrator = VCO. 2164 + integrator with feedback to the 2164 input = 6dB LPF. Neither of these require exponential converters, since the 2164 does that already. _________________ And this abundance of technical means allows the heart to overflow freely.
Olivier Messiaen (1908-1992) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lysander Common Wiggler
Joined: 01 Feb 2012 Last Visit: 25 May 2013
 Posts: 229
|
Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 11:32 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| Dr. Sketch-n-Etch wrote: | I use the 2164 quad exponential VCA almost exclusively as a voltage-control element. It takes a current in (at virtual ground) and attenuates it (with positive voltages) or amplifies it (with negative voltages) depending on the voltage at the control pin. Hence, the ratio between input and output current is determined by a voltage. It is a "voltage-controlled current source" -- in other words, a voltage-controlled resistor.
2164 VCAs must terminate to virtual ground, which means that you must feed each 2164 VCA into the inverting terminal of an opamp with its positive terminal grounded. An opamp wired as an inverter with a resistor in the feedback loop, but with no input resistor, is a "current-to-voltage" converter, and this is what typically follows a 2164 VCA. However, you can also put a capacitor in the feedback loop of the opamp, and now you have an integrator. 2164 + resettable integrator = VCO. 2164 + integrator with feedback to the 2164 input = 6dB LPF. Neither of these require exponential converters, since the 2164 does that already. |
Great tips , thanks !  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Navs Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 18 Sep 2009 Last Visit: 22 May 2013
   Posts: 1849 Location: Berlin, Germany
| |
| Back to top |
|
 |
russma Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 10 Nov 2008 Last Visit: 24 May 2013
    Posts: 1430 Location: Duvall, WA, USA
|
Posted: Tue May 29, 2012 10:54 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
I think Dave uses CoolAudio 2164 clones. See if you can find a CoolAudio distributer in Europe. Behringer uses CoolAudio 2164's in some of their "vintage" knockoffs. _________________ Russ M. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rod Serling Fan Club aquatic hitchhiker
Joined: 14 Dec 2009 Last Visit: 24 May 2013
   Posts: 3433 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Tue May 29, 2012 1:37 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| Dr. Sketch-n-Etch wrote: | I use the 2164 quad exponential VCA almost exclusively as a voltage-control element. It takes a current in (at virtual ground) and attenuates it (with positive voltages) or amplifies it (with negative voltages) depending on the voltage at the control pin. Hence, the ratio between input and output current is determined by a voltage. It is a "voltage-controlled current source" -- in other words, a voltage-controlled resistor.
2164 VCAs must terminate to virtual ground, which means that you must feed each 2164 VCA into the inverting terminal of an opamp with its positive terminal grounded. An opamp wired as an inverter with a resistor in the feedback loop, but with no input resistor, is a "current-to-voltage" converter, and this is what typically follows a 2164 VCA. However, you can also put a capacitor in the feedback loop of the opamp, and now you have an integrator. 2164 + resettable integrator = VCO. 2164 + integrator with feedback to the 2164 input = 6dB LPF. Neither of these require exponential converters, since the 2164 does that already. |
Do you have a schematic/circuit you could show that demonstrates this? I like pictures.
Back on the transistor/FET and vactrol topic. What is the practical benefit of using a vactrol for voltage control? They are expensive, especially compared to a FET transistor. So why do someone peopel continue to use them in newer designs that weren't mean to be a "classic" design (i.e. metasonix)? _________________ DIY panels and PCBs for Buchla and Euro format: http://synthpanels.blogspot.de/
youtube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/MrPalebluedot |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
daverj Vintage Video Wiggler
Joined: 19 Jun 2009 Last Visit: 25 May 2013
   Posts: 4831
|
Posted: Tue May 29, 2012 4:22 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| Rod Serling Fan Club wrote: | | Back on the transistor/FET and vactrol topic. What is the practical benefit of using a vactrol for voltage control? They are expensive, especially compared to a FET transistor. So why do someone peopel continue to use them in newer designs that weren't mean to be a "classic" design (i.e. metasonix)? |
My guess would be for one of two reasons (or both). That a Vactrol is easy to integrate into any circuit where a resistor existed, keeping complete isolation between the control signals and the circuit being controlled. An FET can only be used in certain types of circuits as a variable resistor because of the relationship of the control input to the voltage levels on the source and drain.
And the other reason would be that people like the slow response time of a Vactrol, which for some types of circuits feels more organic or natural than high speed control. _________________ Dave Jones Design | http://www.jonesvideo.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dr. Sketch-n-Etch Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 21 Jan 2010 Last Visit: 25 May 2013
   Posts: 2583 Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
Posted: Tue May 29, 2012 8:20 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| Rod Serling Fan Club wrote: | | Do you have a schematic/circuit you could show that demonstrates this? I like pictures. |
Sure! Here's an OTA-based integrator (note the severe voltage divider on the input, to avoid tanh distortion at the OTA input differential pair):
Now, here's the VCA-based integrator (with a stability network as per the 2164 datasheet -- the inverting integrator provides the all-important termination to virtual ground):
Here's an OTA-based LPF stage (note the voltage divider again on the negative feedback):
Now, here's the VCA-based LPF stage (the integrator also inverts, so the feedback is negative):
Finally, we can put a couple of VCA-based stages together to make, for example, a state-variable filter. This particular circuit uses a third VCA to control feedback for resonance (and the 1.5M resistor guarantees stable oscillation at a gain of 2):
 _________________ And this abundance of technical means allows the heart to overflow freely.
Olivier Messiaen (1908-1992) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
daverj Vintage Video Wiggler
Joined: 19 Jun 2009 Last Visit: 25 May 2013
   Posts: 4831
|
Posted: Wed May 30, 2012 1:44 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Those are cool building blocks. I may have to take a closer look at that chip (some day in the future if I ever have spare time again).
It's been a while since I read the data sheet on the 2164, but I vaguely remember it having a similar temperature drift on the gain input to the classic bipolar expo converter. If that's the case then it would need some kind of temperature compensation network on the gain input to cancel the drift, like the tempco resistor used on the classic circuit. _________________ Dave Jones Design | http://www.jonesvideo.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
J3RK Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 22 Dec 2009 Last Visit: 24 May 2013
   Posts: 2500 Location: Seattle
|
Posted: Wed May 30, 2012 1:56 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| Nice information! Makes me want to play with this chip too! This and the THAT 218Xes. Thanks Dr.! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Navs Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 18 Sep 2009 Last Visit: 22 May 2013
   Posts: 1849 Location: Berlin, Germany
| |
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dr. Sketch-n-Etch Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 21 Jan 2010 Last Visit: 25 May 2013
   Posts: 2583 Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
Posted: Wed May 30, 2012 9:37 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| daverj wrote: | | It's been a while since I read the data sheet on the 2164, but I vaguely remember it having a similar temperature drift on the gain input to the classic bipolar expo converter. If that's the case then it would need some kind of temperature compensation network on the gain input to cancel the drift, like the tempco resistor used on the classic circuit. |
Yes. Look at the CV circuit below:
This is essentially the CV circuit for the Dixie. All of the CV sources (-5V Bias, Coarse, Fine, Extrafine (for ease of calibration), the 1V/octave inputs, and a high-frequency compensation current from the two-transistor exponential current source shown on the right) feed the input of a 2164 "tempco" VCA. By fixing this VCA at the proper gain, the 2164 chip compensates its own temperature coefficient.
The VC pin of the tempco VCA takes a fixed voltage from the 100-ohm trimpot, and the current from this VCA feeds the CV summer. Let us call this fixed voltage "V". The 1V/octave gain of this summer is determined by the ratio of the sum of 20k plus the CV Gain trimmer divided by 43k. Let us call this ratio "G". The output voltage of the CV summer ("ExpoVC" in the schematic) feeds the VC pin of another 2164 VCA which is the actual exponential converter for the VCO. The goal is for the current through this VCA to exactly double for every 1-volt increase in "1VOct".
The question, therefore, is this: What are the proper values of "G" and "V" to give a properly temperature-compensated 1V/octave response.
The answer is surprisingly simple (after a rather involved mathematical analysis):
G = -A * e
V = -A * log(e) / log(2)
where A is the gain factor of the 2164 VCAs in V/octave.
The stated gain factor from the datasheet is -200 mV/octave (-33mV/dB). This would give a gain factor G = 0.5437 and a fixed tempco voltage V = 288.54 mV. That means that the CV feedback resistance should be 43k * 0.5437 = 23.38k, and therefore, the CV Gain trimmer should be at 3.38k, or 67.6% of its full resistance.
In fact, I have found the actual gain values of 2164 VCAs to vary between roughly 185 and 195 mV/octave. Hence, the optimum fixed voltage "V" will vary from circuit to circuit. However, a value of 274 mV (assuming a 2164 gain factor of about 190 mV/octave) is a pretty decent average value, and is in fact how we calibrate the actual Dixies (because it is simply too time-consuming to measure the response of each chip).
In practice, one first sets the tempco voltage "V", and then simply calibrates the VCO (including the HF compensation circuit) to obtain the correct "G" value.
Alternatively, one can simply use a 3300 ppm/C tempco resistor in the CV feedback loop, in which case the VCA can be repurposed as the HF compensation current source. This actually gives slightly better tempco. However, we tend to favour the tempco VCA approach because the other approach requires installing the 2164 chip on top of the tempco resistor, and it is susceptible to ambient fluctuations because of imperfect thermal contact between the two. _________________ And this abundance of technical means allows the heart to overflow freely.
Olivier Messiaen (1908-1992) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Moog$FooL$ Broke Dick Dog
Joined: 03 Jun 2008 Last Visit: 25 May 2013
    Posts: 1222 Location: Vancouver, BC.
|
Posted: Wed May 30, 2012 9:54 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
time for a 2164 group buy!
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
daverj Vintage Video Wiggler
Joined: 19 Jun 2009 Last Visit: 25 May 2013
   Posts: 4831
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:43 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| Dr. Sketch-n-Etch wrote: | | By fixing this VCA at the proper gain, the 2164 chip compensates its own temperature coefficient. |
Brilliant!  _________________ Dave Jones Design | http://www.jonesvideo.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dr. Sketch-n-Etch Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 21 Jan 2010 Last Visit: 25 May 2013
   Posts: 2583 Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 5:02 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| daverj wrote: | | Dr. Sketch-n-Etch wrote: | | By fixing this VCA at the proper gain, the 2164 chip compensates its own temperature coefficient. |
Brilliant!  |
Well, I didn't think of it. Roman Sowa did, and then Sam Hoshuyama sort of rediscovered it. I did, however, work out the maths. _________________ And this abundance of technical means allows the heart to overflow freely.
Olivier Messiaen (1908-1992) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iopop Ultra Wiggler
Joined: 19 May 2010 Last Visit: 24 May 2013
   Posts: 932 Location: Malmö, Sweden
| |
| Back to top |
|
 |
Moog$FooL$ Broke Dick Dog
Joined: 03 Jun 2008 Last Visit: 25 May 2013
    Posts: 1222 Location: Vancouver, BC.
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 1:32 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
like i said...... time for a group buy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rod Serling Fan Club aquatic hitchhiker
Joined: 14 Dec 2009 Last Visit: 24 May 2013
   Posts: 3433 Location: Germany
| |
| Back to top |
|
 |
J3RK Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 22 Dec 2009 Last Visit: 24 May 2013
   Posts: 2500 Location: Seattle
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 1:53 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| Yes, thanks once again! Very nice stuff! Also, I'd be in for some of them if a group buy were to be arranged. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CLee Veteran Wiggler
Joined: 05 Apr 2010 Last Visit: 24 May 2013
   Posts: 703 Location: Chicago
|
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2012 10:33 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Dr SnE, thanks for the tip on the 2164 VCO. I'm working on a circuit that needs a VCO that tracks 1 v/oct but doesn't need to be perfect, or fully temperature stable. This looks like a nice small circuit that I could use without building a whole expo converter.
Craig _________________ www.clsound.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dr. Sketch-n-Etch Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 21 Jan 2010 Last Visit: 25 May 2013
   Posts: 2583 Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2012 4:14 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| CLee wrote: | | Dr SnE, thanks for the tip on the 2164 VCO. I'm working on a circuit that needs a VCO that tracks 1 v/oct but doesn't need to be perfect, or fully temperature stable. This looks like a nice small circuit that I could use without building a whole expo converter. |
Well, you still need an oscillator core. I've only shown the CV circuit. If tracking isn't an issue, you could leave off the second opamp and transistors. _________________ And this abundance of technical means allows the heart to overflow freely.
Olivier Messiaen (1908-1992) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CLee Veteran Wiggler
Joined: 05 Apr 2010 Last Visit: 24 May 2013
   Posts: 703 Location: Chicago
|
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2012 10:42 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Actually I searched for Roman Sowa, whose name you mentioned, and and the 2146 and came accross this,
2146 oscillator
this is a complete VCO, right? _________________ www.clsound.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iopop Ultra Wiggler
Joined: 19 May 2010 Last Visit: 24 May 2013
   Posts: 932 Location: Malmö, Sweden
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 4:16 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Sorry for completely OT, but I couldn't help smiling reading this,
"PS It's only 5K file. Hope you don't mind... " |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ailurophilia Learning to Wiggle
Joined: 31 May 2012 Last Visit: 25 May 2013 Posts: 36 Location: Sydney, Australia
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 7:02 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| CLee wrote: | Actually I searched for Roman Sowa, whose name you mentioned, and and the 2146 and came accross this,
2146 oscillator
this is a complete VCO, right? |
If you don't need perfect temperature stability, then Roman Sowa's original VCO should suit you nicely.
http://www.sowa.synth.net/modular/vco4m.gif
It does, however, have a drift of 0.5%/C. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dr. Sketch-n-Etch Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 21 Jan 2010 Last Visit: 25 May 2013
   Posts: 2583 Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 12:37 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
But that's ridiculous -- only one 2164 VCA is used here, there are three others on the chip. Why not use one as the tempco, as shown above? Then you have a complete VCO with temperature stability as well. You can even use a third one as a HF compensation circuit, to provide a HF correction current to the CV summer. Now you could have a very stable and very accurate VCO, for almost no additional cost. _________________ And this abundance of technical means allows the heart to overflow freely.
Olivier Messiaen (1908-1992) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CLee Veteran Wiggler
Joined: 05 Apr 2010 Last Visit: 24 May 2013
   Posts: 703 Location: Chicago
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 3:56 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| Dr. Sketch-n-Etch wrote: |
But that's ridiculous -- only one 2164 VCA is used here, there are three others on the chip. Why not use one as the tempco, as shown above? Then you have a complete VCO with temperature stability as well. You can even use a third one as a HF compensation circuit, to provide a HF correction current to the CV summer. Now you could have a very stable and very accurate VCO, for almost no additional cost. |
By "as shown above" do you mean the link I have or the schematics you showed on the last page?
I was thinking of trying Roman's schematic if I had a use for the other half of the 2164.
(sorry for sending the thread completely off topic) _________________ www.clsound.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ailurophilia Learning to Wiggle
Joined: 31 May 2012 Last Visit: 25 May 2013 Posts: 36 Location: Sydney, Australia
|
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 3:01 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| Dr. Sketch-n-Etch wrote: |
But that's ridiculous -- only one 2164 VCA is used here, there are three others on the chip. Why not use one as the tempco, as shown above? Then you have a complete VCO with temperature stability as well. You can even use a third one as a HF compensation circuit, to provide a HF correction current to the CV summer. Now you could have a very stable and very accurate VCO, for almost no additional cost. |
I totally agree with this, it just sounded like CLee wanted a bunch of small footprint oscillators, and one 2164 and 4 TL074's for four saw cores is pretty impressive.
@CLee,
The link you provided is the sawtooth core alone, minus extra supporting circuitry for summing and sync. With the addition of the waveshapers (as found in the bottom half of my link) this will work well as a full featured VCO. Alternatively, if you are after greater density, you can ignore the 0 drift schematic and use the core provided in my link (Which uses only one VCA per core). However, this is very drifty, and as Dr. Sketch-n-Etch said, one extra VCA for excellent compensation is a small price to pay. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
neil.johnson Wiggling with Experience
Joined: 08 Apr 2010 Last Visit: 25 May 2013
   Posts: 336 Location: U.K.
| |
| Back to top |
|
 |
neil.johnson Wiggling with Experience
Joined: 08 Apr 2010 Last Visit: 25 May 2013
   Posts: 336 Location: U.K.
|
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 6:50 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| iopop wrote: | Sorry for completely OT, but I couldn't help smiling reading this,
"PS It's only 5K file. Hope you don't mind... " |
If I remember rightly Roman sent it as a uuencoded attachment to a posting to the synth-diy email list, which doesn't allow binary attachments, hence the comment.
Neil _________________ Modules and more :: http://www.cesyg.com @facebook @twitter
Homepage :: http://www.njohnson.co.uk |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
neil.johnson Wiggling with Experience
Joined: 08 Apr 2010 Last Visit: 25 May 2013
   Posts: 336 Location: U.K.
| |
| Back to top |
|
 |
neil.johnson Wiggling with Experience
Joined: 08 Apr 2010 Last Visit: 25 May 2013
   Posts: 336 Location: U.K.
| |
| Back to top |
|
 |
CLee Veteran Wiggler
Joined: 05 Apr 2010 Last Visit: 24 May 2013
   Posts: 703 Location: Chicago
|
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 7:21 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| Ailurophilia wrote: | | Dr. Sketch-n-Etch wrote: |
But that's ridiculous -- only one 2164 VCA is used here, there are three others on the chip. Why not use one as the tempco, as shown above? Then you have a complete VCO with temperature stability as well. You can even use a third one as a HF compensation circuit, to provide a HF correction current to the CV summer. Now you could have a very stable and very accurate VCO, for almost no additional cost. |
I totally agree with this, it just sounded like CLee wanted a bunch of small footprint oscillators, and one 2164 and 4 TL074's for four saw cores is pretty impressive.
@CLee,
The link you provided is the sawtooth core alone, minus extra supporting circuitry for summing and sync. With the addition of the waveshapers (as found in the bottom half of my link) this will work well as a full featured VCO. Alternatively, if you are after greater density, you can ignore the 0 drift schematic and use the core provided in my link (Which uses only one VCA per core). However, this is very drifty, and as Dr. Sketch-n-Etch said, one extra VCA for excellent compensation is a small price to pay. |
Actually what I was (am) looking for is a simple exponential response pulse wave VCO. It will basically be a 1v/oct timing circuit. This looked like a good candidate as I may need a VCA in the same circuit. That way I would be using at least 3/4 of the chip. I may even be able to just use the output of the circuit that resets the saw wave.
I don't need any support circuits other than the CV summers which I would be building anyway.
Thanks for the info guys. Sorry for taking the thread so far off-topic
Neil, now take us back to our regularly scheduled program... _________________ www.clsound.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dr. Sketch-n-Etch Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 21 Jan 2010 Last Visit: 25 May 2013
   Posts: 2583 Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 9:34 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| neil.johnson wrote: | | Dr. Sketch-n-Etch wrote: |
But that's ridiculous |
I think the reason is given in the text at the bottom left of the diagram:
Quad VCO module - one voice shown |
Ah, sorry, I didn't read the whole thing I guess. Still, you could squeeze two VCOs out of a single 2164, or four out of two 2164s, and still have temperature compensation for an extra $4. Alternatively, you could use tempco resistors. _________________ And this abundance of technical means allows the heart to overflow freely.
Olivier Messiaen (1908-1992) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Navs Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 18 Sep 2009 Last Visit: 22 May 2013
   Posts: 1849 Location: Berlin, Germany
| |
| Back to top |
|
 |
Navs Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 18 Sep 2009 Last Visit: 22 May 2013
   Posts: 1849 Location: Berlin, Germany
| |
| Back to top |
|
 |
|