| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Integrated Analog/Digital Video Workstation Builds |
revmutt Knutty For Knobs
Joined: 06 Dec 2008 Last Visit: 20 May 2013
    Posts: 1074 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 7:45 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| creatorlars wrote: | | Probably the cheapest route is going to be getting a DVR meant for security systems -- the $200-$400 models I've looked at before could capture 4+ simultaneous streams in MJPEG 640x480 or something similar. |
That's an interesting idea in general. hmmmm... _________________ Tommy DOG
Punk Rock Star, gambler and stunt double
"tis better to be something then not at all" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bitSmasher Common Wiggler
Joined: 18 May 2011 Last Visit: 02 May 2013
  Posts: 169 Location: Sydney.au
|
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 8:06 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
A hardware standalone box would be awesome, I actually want a small DVR to use in my old VHS camera instead of a cassette... _________________ http://www.youtube.com/user/Bitsmasher |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
daverj Vintage Video Wiggler
Joined: 19 Jun 2009 Last Visit: 21 May 2013
   Posts: 4797
|
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 8:49 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
If you could live with low resolution, you could also use a security camera Quad processor that combines 4 images down to one, and then capture that one. You can then split them apart in editing. They'll each be 1/2 the resolution of the originals (1/2 horizontal and 1/2 vertical). _________________ Dave Jones Design | http://www.jonesvideo.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
barto Wiggling with Experience
Joined: 21 Jan 2011 Last Visit: 22 May 2013
  Posts: 447 Location: seattle
|
Posted: Wed May 16, 2012 7:46 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
sooooo... the music video im working on was shot mostly on HD cameras at 720. i decided i wanted to edit the clips first then sit down and make some nice patches to process the edited video. from there my plan is to mix in the synthesized clips whenever i want. is there any way to do this without scaling it down to SD resolutions? id like the final product to still be 720. or at least allow me to process the footage with the same aspect ratio and then scale it up to match. ill be capturing the footage with an advc 110 _________________ http://nickbartoletti.tumblr.com/
http://crypts.bandcamp.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lizlarsen Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 13 Jan 2010 Last Visit: 20 May 2013
   Posts: 1970 Location: Denton, TX
|
Posted: Wed May 16, 2012 8:01 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Hey Nick, well there are different ways to do this.
The Matrox MXO2 capture interface helps out a bit, since it can output and capture to and from anything -- so you could output your 720p footage directly to 480i NTSC -- and then capture your 480i NTSC to 720p as well. I believe all the conversion happens in hardware acceleration -- so it looks nicer than doing a digital downres, then upres.
Using the ADVC-110 it looks like that's how you're going to have to go though -- which isn't really a problem, it just means you'll have to export 480i/NTSC version of your footage for feeding into the video synth, and then capture in NTSC DV with ADVC-110. Then you'll import than NTSC DV captures into your 720p project and do a digital stretch/up-res.
For the Neon Indian/Mind Drips video, I did a full edit of the video first off, and then burned that to a DVD as looping playback. I fed that into the video synth and then started capturing, and spent several hours tweaking and capturing different takes with different patches. Layering the good takes back into the editing software, I sometimes did a digital luma key to reveal some of the original (unprocessed footage). That's one way to do it. _________________ LZX Industries | http://www.lzxindustries.net |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
barto Wiggling with Experience
Joined: 21 Jan 2011 Last Visit: 22 May 2013
  Posts: 447 Location: seattle
|
Posted: Wed May 16, 2012 8:24 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
thanks lars, the process you mentioned for the neon indian video is about what i had in mind. perhaps it would be a good time to upgrade to the matrox unit.
i suppose ill render out a letterboxed wide screen at 4:3 for processing. hopefully the digital upscaling wont make it look too bad. this advice definitely helps! _________________ http://nickbartoletti.tumblr.com/
http://crypts.bandcamp.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lizlarsen Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 13 Jan 2010 Last Visit: 20 May 2013
   Posts: 1970 Location: Denton, TX
|
Posted: Wed May 16, 2012 8:42 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
You don't have to do a letterboxed widescreen. Remember that NTSC DV video is the same resolution (and the video synth input and output see it the same) whether or not it's 4:3 or 16:9. The aspect ratio is totally up to the display device in question. So you can export widescreen NTSC DV/480i, etc, process it, and capture it that way, through the synth. _________________ LZX Industries | http://www.lzxindustries.net |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnnywoods Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 22 Apr 2010 Last Visit: 22 May 2013
   Posts: 1101 Location: Los Angeles
|
Posted: Wed May 16, 2012 8:53 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
yeah, don't letterbox! you end up losing pixels, and at SD resolution, every pixel is sacred. I can send you the MPEG Streamclip settings I use for this purpose if you'd like. The idea is to squeeze the 16:9 video into a 4:3 frame, then do the opposite when recapturing. _________________ http://www.mathematicalpark.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
barto Wiggling with Experience
Joined: 21 Jan 2011 Last Visit: 22 May 2013
  Posts: 447 Location: seattle
| |
| Back to top |
|
 |
Arturo00 Maximum bass on all frequencies!
Joined: 29 May 2010 Last Visit: 21 May 2013
  Posts: 1639 Location: Ottawa
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2012 12:02 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| creatorlars wrote: | | The Extron is VSC 100GX. I think it's an outdated model compared to the one they offer now. |
I just scored an Extron VSC 500 and a Kramer VS-33C 3:1 CV switcher for $0.00! My video rig is steadily growing. _________________ A/V: http://www.hardscience.ca
Musics: Tapewobble | Hard Science | My Dad vs Yours
Videos: YouTube | Vimeo
Studio: Analogue Head
Titter: @hardscience |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Arturo00 Maximum bass on all frequencies!
Joined: 29 May 2010 Last Visit: 21 May 2013
  Posts: 1639 Location: Ottawa
|
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 8:34 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
In reference to this thread: http://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=899590#899590
I think the Matrox MX02 Mini is likely the best option that will allow me to input and output video simultaneously. One question though, is it considered a "video card", with its own built in ram/accelerators or is it just an I/O box? I ask because I tried adobe premier on my pc with my current (standard) video card and it got reeeeeally choppy. Would I need to upgrade my other video card as well or will the Matrox resolve these issues?
Also, Lars, in your system is the nVidia GeForce 7950GT only there so you can output video without using up one of your monitor outputs? Seeing as how I have the Extron VSC 500 scan converter with VGA loop through, I don't need a 3rd video card if I want to maintain a dual monitor setup.
Also curious about why/how you have Y, R-Y and B-Y into your lzx system from the Extron scan converter. Is that some yet-to-be released module that accepts component ins? In my case I would just go CV into the lzx, right? _________________ A/V: http://www.hardscience.ca
Musics: Tapewobble | Hard Science | My Dad vs Yours
Videos: YouTube | Vimeo
Studio: Analogue Head
Titter: @hardscience |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lizlarsen Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 13 Jan 2010 Last Visit: 20 May 2013
   Posts: 1970 Location: Denton, TX
|
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 9:00 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| Quote: | | I think the Matrox MX02 Mini is likely the best option that will allow me to input and output video simultaneously. |
The Matrox MX02 will not input and output video simultaneously. Only one direction at a time. It does both very well, though! My setup could be realized with any capture device, providing the hardware drivers don't glitch out with the simultaneous playback/capture.
| Quote: | | One question though, is it considered a "video card", with its own built in ram/accelerators or is it just an I/O box? |
It is not a video card, it won't be recognized by Windows that way. You probably want to upgrade your existing video card as well.
| Quote: | | Also, Lars, in your system is the nVidia GeForce 7950GT only there so you can output video without using up one of your monitor outputs? |
Yep. I just had it lying around.
| Quote: | | Also curious about why/how you have Y, R-Y and B-Y into your lzx system from the Extron scan converter. Is that some yet-to-be released module that accepts component ins? In my case I would just go CV into the lzx, right? |
Triple Video Interface (formerly "Color Video Interface") is finished and will go into production this fall, see this thread:
http://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=35378
You take component in, and get six outs! YUV and RGB.
It can also take 3 externally sync-locked cameras, and other use-cases. It's a swiss army knife of video input cases which do not require a Time Base Corrector (that'll be coming this fall too.) _________________ LZX Industries | http://www.lzxindustries.net |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnnywoods Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 22 Apr 2010 Last Visit: 22 May 2013
   Posts: 1101 Location: Los Angeles
|
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 9:02 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| Arturo00 wrote: |
I think the Matrox MX02 Mini is likely the best option that will allow me to input and output video simultaneously. One question though, is it considered a "video card", with its own built in ram/accelerators or is it just an I/O box? I ask because I tried adobe premier on my pc with my current (standard) video card and it got reeeeeally choppy. Would I need to upgrade my other video card as well or will the Matrox resolve these issues?
|
first off, the Matrox does not allow for simultaneous i/o of separate streams. Nothing out there does. This is not really a common need for digital video production.
The codec conversion processing and upscaling in the Matrox is done by the unit itself, but 90% of the time, your issues in an editing program are due to hard drive or ram problems. Neither of which the Matrox will resolve. HD is the likely suspect in your case. Were you editing videos off a fast internal drive? _________________ http://www.mathematicalpark.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Arturo00 Maximum bass on all frequencies!
Joined: 29 May 2010 Last Visit: 21 May 2013
  Posts: 1639 Location: Ottawa
|
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 9:50 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| johnnywoods wrote: | | first off, the Matrox does not allow for simultaneous i/o of separate streams. Nothing out there does. This is not really a common need for digital video production. |
Oh shoot. I knew that. I guess what I was trying to say is it's a good I/O device (from what I'm reading), and used along with my current video card (which I'll have to upgrade as well) will allow me to output and input simultaneously to some degree.
| johnnywoods wrote: | | The codec conversion processing and upscaling in the Matrox is done by the unit itself, but 90% of the time, your issues in an editing program are due to hard drive or ram problems. Neither of which the Matrox will resolve. HD is the likely suspect in your case. Were you editing videos off a fast internal drive? |
Yeah, I was running off an internal drive. I'm pretty sure it's 7200rpm.
Just a little info in case it might come in handy. My pc is an Intel Q8200 Quad Core @ 2.33GHz w/ 4 GB of RAM running Windows Vista Home PRemium 32-bit. It's about three years old and was built specifically for audio production. Unfortunately I got it just after Windows' 64-bit operating system became available, so drivers hadn't been fully developed, and just before Windows 7 came out. I have three hard drives. Two are 500GB and one is 1TB. I'm pretty sure all are at least 7200rpm. Again, it was built for audio so I'll be terribly disappointed if that's not the case. My video card is an ATI Radeon HD3400.
If RAM is the problem, I'll have to upgrade my OS to Windows 7 64-bit before I can even consider adding more RAM. _________________ A/V: http://www.hardscience.ca
Musics: Tapewobble | Hard Science | My Dad vs Yours
Videos: YouTube | Vimeo
Studio: Analogue Head
Titter: @hardscience |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lizlarsen Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 13 Jan 2010 Last Visit: 20 May 2013
   Posts: 1970 Location: Denton, TX
|
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 9:53 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
I'd definitely recommend the Windows 7 upgrade. Vista is pretty clunky.
The most -ideal- situation for this kind of workflow would be to have two machines with two Matrox's -- one to output, one to capture. The quality through the scan converter isn't going to be even near the quality of direct out of the Matrox. It's frustrating! :( I should probably get a Betacam deck or something at some point. Then you could dump from the Matrox to a really nice tape format, then use that for playback and capture back in with the Matrox. _________________ LZX Industries | http://www.lzxindustries.net |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Arturo00 Maximum bass on all frequencies!
Joined: 29 May 2010 Last Visit: 21 May 2013
  Posts: 1639 Location: Ottawa
|
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 9:56 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Hah. Yeah I read through that entire thread. I found it extremely intimidating. I have SO much to learn about video.
Edit: I mistook that thread for another one.
Either way, I don't fully understand what the modules do :( _________________ A/V: http://www.hardscience.ca
Musics: Tapewobble | Hard Science | My Dad vs Yours
Videos: YouTube | Vimeo
Studio: Analogue Head
Titter: @hardscience
Last edited by Arturo00 on Mon Aug 13, 2012 10:02 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spaceship Common Wiggler
Joined: 01 Feb 2011 Last Visit: 15 May 2013
  Posts: 191 Location: Austin, Tx
|
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 10:00 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| I have the MX02 mini MAX, but it's not very fun to use w/ final cut pro x. Otherwise it's a solid little box and does everything I need it to do. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
giorgio NITE MIND
Joined: 24 Oct 2009 Last Visit: 22 May 2013
   Posts: 2411 Location: BRAND NEW YORK
|
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 10:04 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
i just got the blackmagic intensity shuttle thunderbolt (what a fucking name they had to give this thing) and it is leading me to believe that it can do in and out at the same time. I don't know though, I have only just got capture and hardware upconverting working so far. gonna hook up the vidsynth tonight, maybe I'll try outputting from it, since it will also hardward downconvert from HD to composite SD for processing with all my video gear. _________________ ▲✌♡✂☃☂☁☀☻☹☺♢✄✐☒☠☣☢☤☎✇✈✖▼
FS in NYC: http://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1160656 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lizlarsen Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 13 Jan 2010 Last Visit: 20 May 2013
   Posts: 1970 Location: Denton, TX
|
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 10:28 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
When learning about this stuff for the first time, what are the big areas of difficulty when grasping concepts? I know it took me a long time to wrap my head around the analogue video signal after a lifetime of using computers. I'll do a tutorial/educational video soon trying to explain it in easily relatable terms. _________________ LZX Industries | http://www.lzxindustries.net |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zapp550 i'm prefect, are you?
Joined: 29 Oct 2010 Last Visit: 21 May 2013
  Posts: 910 Location: Hobart, IN
| |
| Back to top |
|
 |
|