| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Serge DCSM: Should the two outputs be out of phase? |
weerzin Common Wiggler
Joined: 14 Feb 2011 Last Visit: 18 Jun 2013
  Posts: 83 Location: Berlin
|
Posted: Sat May 26, 2012 11:12 am Post subject: Serge DCSM: Should the two outputs be out of phase? |
 |
|
|
On my DCSM (part of a Soup Kitchen panel built around 2006) the two outputs are out of phase with each other.
Just curious if this is the way it should be.
Also, with the controls fully clockwise, the gain at channel 2 is noticably higher than at channel 1.
Has anyone tried calibrating these VCA's themselves? I might.
Thanks for any feedback. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
electronicpresskit Wiggling with Experience
Joined: 30 Aug 2009 Last Visit: 11 Jun 2013
   Posts: 256 Location: Berlin
|
Posted: Sun May 27, 2012 12:59 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
I noticed that issue when I had one of those and it seemed like a mistake to me. I *think* the issue was only on the 1/4" outs or the XLR outs but one of them was normal?
I don't remember any gain differences between the channels. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
anthonybisset a point to make
Joined: 06 Dec 2010 Last Visit: 18 Jun 2013
  Posts: 211 Location: California / J?p?n
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 8:05 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
I had a soup kitchen that had the same problem (I didn't sell it, I dismantled it as I needed the FS, this is before m-boats.). Anyway, very odd 3 of us have experienced this. Anyone else? _________________ music.anthonybisset.com
www.anthonybisset.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
b3nsf Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 24 Jan 2009 Last Visit: 18 Jun 2013
    Posts: 2158 Location: San Francisco
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 12:47 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
My soup is a new one from 2011, it appears the two channels will cancel each other out if the same signal is applied to both, the volumes are the same however... _________________ its like saying you experience michaelangelo because there is a picture on your happy meal
--shreddoggie
Last time I checked there was nothing Vanilla about old Chi- Acid....that shit's Chocolate as it gets.
--Kendall Station |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Borellus Common Wiggler
Joined: 22 Aug 2010 Last Visit: 19 Jun 2013
  Posts: 143 Location: west coast
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 2:55 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
I believe the XFAD works the same way. This may be a feature rather than a bug (possibly optimized for feedback loops?). _________________ "...I often heard sounds which filled me with an indefinable dread—the dread of vague wonder and brooding mystery. It was not that the sounds were hideous, for they were not; but that they held vibrations suggesting nothing on this globe of earth, and that at certain intervals they assumed a symphonic quality which I could hardly conceive as produced by one player."
--H.P. Lovecraft, The Music of Erich Zann
http://soundcloud.com/xrmx-1 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
weerzin Common Wiggler
Joined: 14 Feb 2011 Last Visit: 18 Jun 2013
  Posts: 83 Location: Berlin
|
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 6:23 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
thanks for the feedback guys.
sounds like it's supposed to be this way then, if all four of us have out-phase-outputs.
electronicpresskit, are those xlr outs you mention on the back of your panel, as a custom addition? i vaguely recall those being offered/mentioned before. i don't have any xlr connectors in my serge system myself.
the level difference i'm experiencing just needs some calibration, i imagine. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
electronicpresskit Wiggling with Experience
Joined: 30 Aug 2009 Last Visit: 11 Jun 2013
   Posts: 256 Location: Berlin
|
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 12:49 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
I was not the original owner of the panel I had so I'm not sure about the XLR outs being custom, but I too seem to remember hearing about it being an option from STS.
If this is a feature, I'd love to understand the logic behind it. I always thought most people use this as a sort of main output to the rest of their system, and being out of phase was a mistake in the wiring documentation or an incorrect trace on the board...especially since the XLR's did not have this issue (feature). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rastko Wiggling with Experience
Joined: 27 Oct 2009 Last Visit: 16 Jun 2013
   Posts: 295 Location: Yangon , Myanmar
|
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 1:20 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
hi,
mine is out of phase as well:-).
Yes the XFAD works the same way as well.
so I do not know why but it is normal to be not normal.
Rex ?
i wish you a nice day
r _________________ www.rastko.info |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
anthonybisset a point to make
Joined: 06 Dec 2010 Last Visit: 18 Jun 2013
  Posts: 211 Location: California / J?p?n
|
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2012 6:01 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Mistake or not, I'm critical of a mixer design that has the two output channels out of phase by default without a toggle or pot to control the phase. _________________ music.anthonybisset.com
www.anthonybisset.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sascha.victoria deleted/nevermind
Joined: 06 Dec 2008 Last Visit: 19 Jun 2013
    Posts: 2156
|
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2012 1:19 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
I'll have to check mine later. Before everyone gets their panties in a ruffle shouldn't someone ask Rex why it's that way? Getting all critical of something without understanding where maker is coming from doesn't make sense to me.
I'm pretty sure XLR, TRS, or TT connectors on the back are at the buyers request and do not fit on the shallow boats. Also, the connectors on the back are isolated from the ones on the front so you can plug into the front and back process things differently, monitor separately, etc... This is very handy. _________________ WTB: EMS 8 Octave Filter Bank, Pitch to Voltage, and Random Voltage Generator units in the wood case. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Setherian Common Wiggler
Joined: 09 Mar 2011 Last Visit: 19 Jun 2013
  Posts: 236 Location: Berlin, Brazil!
| |
| Back to top |
|
 |
MindMachine weekend warrior
Joined: 02 Aug 2009 Last Visit: 16 Jun 2013
   Posts: 2140 Location: California South
|
Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 11:54 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
I might call him this week. I need to check his status on vinyl. I send him blues recordings fairly often.
Has this out of phase issue caused problems? Why would you send the same signal to two inputs on the DCSM? If they are different inputs on each channel does the problem go away?
I am not so hip on these basic acoustic issues like phase cancellation. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
b3nsf Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 24 Jan 2009 Last Visit: 18 Jun 2013
    Posts: 2158 Location: San Francisco
|
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 5:41 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
I called STS and talked to Kevin Fortune about it, It is still Serge's original design, the second channel is inverted because there wasn't enough room otherwise... Also Serge wasn't being too concerned about passing an already-stereo source signal back then...
I'm not too disappointed if Serge thought it was cool back then...
keep in mind that right next to this module in the soup kitchen is the dual phasor so if you were really bent out of shape you could phase them any way you liked!! _________________ its like saying you experience michaelangelo because there is a picture on your happy meal
--shreddoggie
Last time I checked there was nothing Vanilla about old Chi- Acid....that shit's Chocolate as it gets.
--Kendall Station |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sascha.victoria deleted/nevermind
Joined: 06 Dec 2008 Last Visit: 19 Jun 2013
    Posts: 2156
|
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 6:42 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
After thinking about this I can't really see why this would be an issue either. The SAME signal out of both channels? I can't imagine doing this myself.
I guess the point where I'm coming from is that this isn't a multi-mic drum recording where you need to be really aware of these issues so the drums don't sound phase-y. Unless that's what you want. This is a completely synthetic sound. Sure you spend serious time tweaking it to be just right but I can't recall ever making a sound that didn't have some left right movement in it. If I don't want left right movement I generally want it to be mono so I'm only using 1 out. You know? _________________ WTB: EMS 8 Octave Filter Bank, Pitch to Voltage, and Random Voltage Generator units in the wood case. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sascha.victoria deleted/nevermind
Joined: 06 Dec 2008 Last Visit: 19 Jun 2013
    Posts: 2156
|
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 6:44 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Can someone explain why this would be an issue to them as I can't see why it would be an issue to me. _________________ WTB: EMS 8 Octave Filter Bank, Pitch to Voltage, and Random Voltage Generator units in the wood case. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
electronicpresskit Wiggling with Experience
Joined: 30 Aug 2009 Last Visit: 11 Jun 2013
   Posts: 256 Location: Berlin
|
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 7:04 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| b3nsf wrote: | | I called STS and talked to Kevin Fortune about it, It is still Serge's original design, the second channel is inverted because there wasn't enough room otherwise... Also Serge wasn't being too concerned about passing an already-stereo source signal back then... |
That doesn't make much sense to me as the problem is most obvious when there is a mono signal going into both channels.
| b3nsf wrote: | | keep in mind that right next to this module in the soup kitchen is the dual phasor so if you were really bent out of shape you could phase them any way you liked!! |
Phasor's are frequency dependent so it's not the same thing, although it certainly could modify the sound enough so the issue wasn't noticeable.
Thanks for calling and getting an actual answer! It's nice to know that this is indeed just a design shortcoming. I think the XLR outs on the panel I had each had little boards on them so they were probably able to correct the problem there, and that's why those were in phase. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
b3nsf Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 24 Jan 2009 Last Visit: 18 Jun 2013
    Posts: 2158 Location: San Francisco
|
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 7:21 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| electronicpresskit wrote: | | That doesn't make much sense to me as the problem is most obvious when there is a mono signal going into both channels. |
but for mono, you could go into one channel and pan it in the center... right?
| electronicpresskit wrote: | | Thanks for calling and getting an actual answer! |
no problem, I enjoy calling them. _________________ its like saying you experience michaelangelo because there is a picture on your happy meal
--shreddoggie
Last time I checked there was nothing Vanilla about old Chi- Acid....that shit's Chocolate as it gets.
--Kendall Station |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
electronicpresskit Wiggling with Experience
Joined: 30 Aug 2009 Last Visit: 11 Jun 2013
   Posts: 256 Location: Berlin
|
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 7:45 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| sascha.victoria wrote: | | Can someone explain why this would be an issue to them as I can't see why it would be an issue to me. |
That's great if it's not an issue for the way you use the system, but there are a couple situations I can think of where it comes into play and probably more that I can't anticipate.
If using the DCSM to connect directly to a pair of speakers, or a stereo processor, you need to use each output jack. Yes, you can pan one channel to both outputs but what if you also have a stereo signal you want to output? The balance is thrown off and you don't get full stereo spread.
I had a Dual Mixer next to my DCSM and would often use one for the left channel and the other for the right, sometimes having the same signal (bassline) going to both channels but then also have another signal (WAD A or Frequency shifter sum) only going to one side and another (WAD B or Frequency shifter diff) to the other etc.
I'm trying to think of the other situations it would be a problem but each one comes back to the core issue, where you can't accurately do stereo and mono at the same time. It's not like I can't use the system but for the way I patch it's one more thing to be conscious of and figure out how to compensate for.
Part of what's great about using a Serge system for me is not having to think about technical "gotcha's". Everything is banana so you patch what you want and flow, no thinking about sample rates and clock masters, no (or very little) going from banana to minijack or 1/4". This issue takes away from that.
If I still had my panel I'd just build a little tl072 board or dead bug it and the problem would be solved for me, but it doesn't help non-diyers. I think it's unfortunate that this hasn't been resolved in the 20+ years that design has been around. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
weerzin Common Wiggler
Joined: 14 Feb 2011 Last Visit: 18 Jun 2013
  Posts: 83 Location: Berlin
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 3:43 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| electronicpresskit wrote: | | sascha.victoria wrote: | | Can someone explain why this would be an issue to them as I can't see why it would be an issue to me. |
If using the DCSM to connect directly to a pair of speakers, or a stereo processor, you need to use each output jack. Yes, you can pan one channel to both outputs but what if you also have a stereo signal you want to output? The balance is thrown off and you don't get full stereo spread.
I had a Dual Mixer next to my DCSM and would often use one for the left channel and the other for the right, sometimes having the same signal (bassline) going to both channels but then also have another signal (WAD A or Frequency shifter sum) only going to one side and another (WAD B or Frequency shifter diff) to the other etc.
I'm trying to think of the other situations it would be a problem but each one comes back to the core issue, where you can't accurately do stereo and mono at the same time. It's not like I can't use the system but for the way I patch it's one more thing to be conscious of and figure out how to compensate for. |
agreed (although i mostly just asked out of curiosity, it isn't often a real-life issue)
thanks for looking into this everyone! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|