| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
E440 Discrete OTA VCF : 2 ways to go |
jw112 Common Wiggler
Joined: 27 Sep 2011 Last Visit: 21 May 2013
 Posts: 123 Location: the OC
|
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 11:53 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| im really looking forward to this one |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
paults mice nuts
Joined: 16 Jan 2009 Last Visit: 21 May 2013
    Posts: 2549
|
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2012 2:18 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
100% routed. Need to clean up the silkscreen a bit but off for 4 prototype pc boards on Monday. 2 weeks to get back, 1 week to solder. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Drumdrumdrumdrum What she said
Joined: 26 Jul 2011 Last Visit: 21 May 2013
 Posts: 2907 Location: Tropical Australia
|
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 8:19 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
You didn't leave much room for the Unicorns!? _________________ "Modular synths can take your ego out of the equation – which, in music, is a blessing" - Jeremy Greenspan
Gear For Sale/Trade: http://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=83341 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mangobob Wiggling with Experience
Joined: 23 Jan 2011 Last Visit: 21 May 2013
  Posts: 256
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 11:53 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| Will this oscillate at low frequencies to use as a sine LFO too? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
paults mice nuts
Joined: 16 Jan 2009 Last Visit: 21 May 2013
    Posts: 2549
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 12:26 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
I will have to run tests for the +-12V conversion (the original MOTM-440 is +-15V biased). I will guess that for full-scale sine outs the lowest frequency will be around 18Hz. So probably not a LFO.
But makes a dandy VCO, even not calibrated to exactly 1V/Oct it will be close and will track 4 octaves or so. The sine out is very pure, on the order of 0.025% THD. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
komyta Ultra Wiggler
Joined: 14 Jan 2011 Last Visit: 21 May 2013
  Posts: 966 Location: France
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 2:08 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
That looks so sweet.  _________________ Look at the silence
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mangobob Wiggling with Experience
Joined: 23 Jan 2011 Last Visit: 21 May 2013
  Posts: 256
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 8:45 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| paults wrote: | | But makes a dandy VCO, even not calibrated to exactly 1V/Oct it will be close and will track 4 octaves or so. The sine out is very pure, on the order of 0.025% THD. |
Great.. always handy to have an extra clean sine around  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Drumdrumdrumdrum What she said
Joined: 26 Jul 2011 Last Visit: 21 May 2013
 Posts: 2907 Location: Tropical Australia
|
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:10 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
I may have to get two of these babies?! That way there will be a good chance the e410 will follow the e440's journey to Euro.
Everyone buy two!  _________________ "Modular synths can take your ego out of the equation – which, in music, is a blessing" - Jeremy Greenspan
Gear For Sale/Trade: http://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=83341 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
paults mice nuts
Joined: 16 Jan 2009 Last Visit: 21 May 2013
    Posts: 2549
|
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:38 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
UPDATE: the prototype pc boards (shown above) arrive tomorrow. Sending them off to be professionally soldered next week. If it all works and sounds good will order production parts to build 1st week of August.
The MOTM-410 currently uses 3 dual Vactrols. This is an issue because:
a) price of Vactrols has TRIPLED last 14 months
b) they cannot (technically) be sold into the EU
There are current arguments for (b) that modules do not apply (but say a rack mount compressor or guitar pedal WOULD apply).
However, what makes the MOTM-410 unique is how the LFOs are set up and how the 3 BP filters are controlled by a clever switching/VCA scheme.
Which I could do ALL of this (and a few more clever tricks) in DSP code, reducing the retail price about $80 and eliminate the RoHS issue with the Vactrols. The inherent "sluggishness" and non-linear Vactrol responses are easily modeled in the DSP code (although I'm sure some folks would think they could tell the difference).
I would rather do it in DSP code because I can immediately think of 2 features I would add to the E410 (one being internal LFOs brought out to panel jacks and make them morphing LFOs) over just a MOTM-410 'reboarding'.
Last edited by paults on Wed Jun 27, 2012 11:31 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tonnu Veteran Wiggler
Joined: 22 Apr 2009 Last Visit: 21 May 2013
    Posts: 620
|
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 10:58 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| what is the E410? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
komyta Ultra Wiggler
Joined: 14 Jan 2011 Last Visit: 21 May 2013
  Posts: 966 Location: France
|
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 11:11 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| tonnu wrote: | | what is the E410? |
The E410 does not exist (yet), it would be the Euro version of the MOTM-410 for which you can find info here :
http://www.synthtech.com/motm410.html _________________ Look at the silence
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tonnu Veteran Wiggler
Joined: 22 Apr 2009 Last Visit: 21 May 2013
    Posts: 620
|
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 11:26 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| komyta wrote: | | tonnu wrote: | | what is the E410? |
The E410 does not exist (yet), it would be the Euro version of the MOTM-410 for which you can find info here :
http://www.synthtech.com/motm410.html |
but i want the e440 :(
like badly
very very badly |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
paults mice nuts
Joined: 16 Jan 2009 Last Visit: 21 May 2013
    Posts: 2549
|
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 11:30 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Not to worry: E440 will be at the dealears in late Aug/Early Sept if the prototype is fine (which is true about 75% of the time, but I do goof up every now and then).
I edited previous post, I should have said "..what makes the MOTM-410 unique is..."
The proposed E410 would have all the features of the MOTM-410 with additions.
BTW: we are in the process of looking at the next generation ST32 ARM CPUs that have higher clock speeds (over 150MHz) and floating point math. This will allow more dynamic real-time processing. The CPUs are more $$$ but run about 3X faster than what I use now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Drumdrumdrumdrum What she said
Joined: 26 Jul 2011 Last Visit: 21 May 2013
 Posts: 2907 Location: Tropical Australia
|
Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2012 3:02 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
My fault for going OT and getting ahead of myself.
Really looking forward to the e440.  _________________ "Modular synths can take your ego out of the equation – which, in music, is a blessing" - Jeremy Greenspan
Gear For Sale/Trade: http://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=83341 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
itijik Three eyed monster
Joined: 24 Nov 2009 Last Visit: 21 May 2013
   Posts: 1693 Location: Fresno, CA USA
|
Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2012 11:20 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Patiently waiting for the E440  _________________ http://itijik.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
paults mice nuts
Joined: 16 Jan 2009 Last Visit: 21 May 2013
    Posts: 2549
|
Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:21 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
The soldering on the 4 protos begins tomorrow. Not my me, by REAL pros  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JohnLRice Howl at the Moon
Joined: 09 Aug 2008 Last Visit: 21 May 2013
    Posts: 7697 Location: Western WA USA
| |
| Back to top |
|
 |
paults mice nuts
Joined: 16 Jan 2009 Last Visit: 21 May 2013
    Posts: 2549
|
Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:48 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Human females that have been doing this for a living. For 18 years. Who hand-solder 0201 and 0402 size parts (I crap out at o603 resistors, can do 0603 caps).
Production is 100% robot. But for protos I usually do the soldering but not this time (each board has like 142 soldered SMT parts). I'd rather spend the time soldering modules together and shipping to waiting folks (just finished 16 E340s). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dofkev Veteran Wiggler
Joined: 22 Nov 2010 Last Visit: 20 May 2013
  Posts: 585 Location: Saint Louis
|
Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2012 1:28 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| paults wrote: |
The MOTM-410 currently uses 3 dual Vactrols. This is an issue because:
a) price of Vactrols has TRIPLED last 14 months
b) they cannot (technically) be sold into the EU
Which I could do ALL of this (and a few more clever tricks) in DSP code, reducing the retail price about $80 and eliminate the RoHS issue with the Vactrols. The inherent "sluggishness" and non-linear Vactrol responses are easily modeled in the DSP code (although I'm sure some folks would think they could tell the difference).
|
I would gladly pay $80 more for an analog version of the 410. I'm not trying to start an analog vs digital debate, just expressing that it is worth $80 to me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Drumdrumdrumdrum What she said
Joined: 26 Jul 2011 Last Visit: 21 May 2013
 Posts: 2907 Location: Tropical Australia
|
Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 3:41 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
This is turning into a e410 thread, which is fine with me. I too would pay more for analogue vectorials. Vectorials are my friend.
One question. If you go with DSP will you still be able to 'ping' the filters? _________________ "Modular synths can take your ego out of the equation – which, in music, is a blessing" - Jeremy Greenspan
Gear For Sale/Trade: http://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=83341 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|