| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Tip-Top 808 hats vs. Doepfer A-117 |
phase ghost Ultra Wiggler
Joined: 21 Jan 2010 Last Visit: 20 May 2013
   Posts: 866 Location: Pittsburgh, US
|
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 7:15 pm Post subject: Tip-Top 808 hats vs. Doepfer A-117 |
 |
|
|
Anyone have (or have had) both of these and care to shed any light on the differences in sound? Obviously the Tip-Top is a fully featured while the A-117 is just a sound source that needs enveloped/vca'd. I'm mostly interested in the tone differences / similarities. Thanks!
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lorenzovektor I want cyborg legs
Joined: 07 Feb 2011 Last Visit: 20 May 2013
  Posts: 643 Location: Chicago
| |
| Back to top |
|
 |
swiv Veteran Wiggler
Joined: 04 Nov 2009 Last Visit: 20 May 2013
   Posts: 582 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 2:12 am Post subject: Re: Tip-Top 808 hats vs. Doepfer A-117 |
 |
|
|
| Check the attachment for TT808 HH BP out with res at 0 (start) vs. the a117 6 osc out (end.) The output for the TT808HH is normally half as quiet as the a117 (with res at 0) but I normalized the samples here. I have no idea what sort of filter is in the TT module, but I tried to BP the a117 using a QMMG and had no luck in matching their tones. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
READYdot controlled by voltage!
Joined: 09 Jan 2010 Last Visit: 20 May 2013
   Posts: 847 Location: Luxembourg, EUROPE
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 1:36 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
^TROLL! _________________ WANT uATT, TTA BD808 CB808 HT909 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
swiv Veteran Wiggler
Joined: 04 Nov 2009 Last Visit: 20 May 2013
   Posts: 582 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 3:47 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
swiv Veteran Wiggler
Joined: 04 Nov 2009 Last Visit: 20 May 2013
   Posts: 582 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 4:02 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| Apologies if you were expecting hi hats.. I thought a basic demo of the unmodulated BP/Osc outs would be useful for figuring out the difference in tone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|