new multiples idea, 4x5x5x4?

Moog, Synthesizers.com, MOTM, Modcan, Moon and others..... Go big!

Moderators: Kent, Joe., analogdigital, infradead, lisa, parasitk, plord

Post Reply
User avatar
Xero
Common Wiggler
Posts: 185
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2012 12:02 am

new multiples idea, 4x5x5x4?

Post by Xero » Fri Jun 28, 2019 2:32 pm

After seeing that multiples thread and all that fun discussion, it got me thinking....

i had this idea for a super dense multiples module, all switched, it's like 4x5x5x4. the 5x5 sections are vertical, and the 4x4 sections are in the typical square layout. I photoshopped a few together...not sure where the "middle" switched jack should really be, thinking either centered or top/bottom. Essentially it would all be connected together and you could use it as a huge single multiple, or any combination of the switched jacks to break it apart into the 4x5x5x4 sections.

Does anyone else like this idea? Am I crazy for trying to stick a-bajillion jacks on one tiny module? I sort of was surprised no one's done this already, I feel like I'm always thinking about density and stuff like that...but I know i'm not the only one!

Image
Image

the only place i've ever seen something similar is the first page of this megaohm PDF here, but this doesn't provide much detail, and the jacks aren't switched from the looks of it:
http://www.megaohmaudio.com/images/PassiveAttMult1.pdf

I'd almost like to replace all my multiples with something like this. I have the half-height M590CP from moon which sort of inspired this idea.

I am kinda curious if there's any other interest? Maybe we could do some kind of batch order of panels? Figured i'd see what people thought first.

User avatar
MrNezumi
Wiggling with Experience
Posts: 329
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2016 8:12 am
Location: Out of Bounds

Post by MrNezumi » Fri Jun 28, 2019 2:53 pm

This is pretty close to the MOTM multiple, but has two more jacks.

JohnLRice

Post by JohnLRice » Fri Jun 28, 2019 2:58 pm

If the jacks will fit, which they likely will, it should work fine. :tu: Personally I prefer to have a toggle switch to combine/disconnect sections because the jack acting as a switch seems like a waste half the time? :hmm: :hihi:

If you want even greater density, consider that 3 jacks will fit across the width of a 1 MU panel. SSL has a couple 1 MU modules with 24 jacks on them:
Image

And Dave Peck has suggested even greater density by squeezing in more rows, up to 10! :eek: :sb: I don't know if he ever made one though.
Dave Peck wrote:... the one major function that a 2600 has which is missing from my idea above is a ring modulator. So I could stick a Ring Mod PCB from a dotcom RM module behind a custom multiples panel.

I have noticed that when I use a multiple, it's almost always as a 1-in-2-out, and sometimes as a 1-in-4-out, but rarely as a 1-in-3-out as is often found in various stock Multiples modules. So I could whip up a custom hi-density multiples module that has five 1-to-2 sections and a couple of 1-to-5 sections, with the ring mod in & out jacks at the bottom:

Image

User avatar
Flareless
Super Deluxe Wiggler
Posts: 1229
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 6:33 am
Location: Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Post by Flareless » Fri Jun 28, 2019 3:24 pm

JohnLRice wrote:... Personally I prefer to have a toggle switch to combine/disconnect sections because the jack acting as a switch seems like a waste half the time? :hmm: :hihi: ...]
I agree. I designed my Multipass as a sort of dual version of the Dotcom Multiple. It's excellently effective especially for turning patches on and off. For example if you had an LFO driving a patch you can plug it into one of the top 4 jacks then have the outputs come from the next 4 jacks below.

That way you can introduce / cut off the LFO by flipping the switch. This will of course work if you you half-way pull out your source signal from any Multiple. It's just the switch makes it so nice and elegant.

Image
Rich

Lower West Side Studio

What can this strange device be? When I touch it, it gives forth a sound - Neil Peart

User avatar
MrNezumi
Wiggling with Experience
Posts: 329
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2016 8:12 am
Location: Out of Bounds

Post by MrNezumi » Fri Jun 28, 2019 5:26 pm

JohnLRice wrote:....because the jack acting as a switch seems like a waste half the time? :hmm: :hihi:
I agree that half the time it is a waste to have switches. I rarely use more than three "copies" of something, so for me having four sets of four jacks is preferable to three sets plus switches.

User avatar
Rex Coil 7
Super Deluxe Wiggler
Posts: 6273
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:29 am
Location: Captain Of Outer Space

Post by Rex Coil 7 » Fri Jun 28, 2019 7:41 pm

:despair:


Image
Never Quit, Die Falling Forward
5U PROJECT - (skip pages 4 through 6, boring junk) ... https://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewt ... highlight=

User avatar
Xero
Common Wiggler
Posts: 185
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2012 12:02 am

Post by Xero » Sat Jun 29, 2019 1:08 pm

OK so now i am thinking new idea...

going 3 columns is probably a little ridiculous, but maybe worth a try.

What if instead of that, there's 3 switches in the middle, to connect or disconnect the sections?

Post Reply

Return to “5U Format Modules”