 |
Muff's Modules & More cats and modular synths, but mostly cats
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Why does this LM13700 VCF design have a volume drop? |
frequencycentral Kicking the shit out of your speakers
Joined: 31 Dec 2009 Last Visit: 19 Jun 2013
   Posts: 812 Location: Rick, FC>UK
|
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 3:35 pm Post subject: Why does this LM13700 VCF design have a volume drop? |
 |
|
|
I found this really simple multimode in an old copy of E&MM, part of the 'Synbal' circuit. I did a PCB for just the VCF part, adapted for bipolar power. The filter itself is nice, doesn't self oscillate, the modes are cool. But there's a significant volume drop with respect to the input signal. The filter itself is nice, doesn't self oscillate, but the modes are cool. Maybe an error on my layout, but I'm pretty sure I checked it thouroughly. Why does this VCF design have a volume drop? Is there any glaring reason that I'm missing? Any quick fix suggestions?
 _________________ Frequency Central available at Analogue Haven - Equinoxoz - Lamond Design - Joe's Pedals - Prymaxe |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
L-1 Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 14 Dec 2011 Last Visit: 19 Jun 2013
 Posts: 1175 Location: Belarus
|
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 7:11 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
If you install 0.1 uF cap with 10K impedance you have -3dB at 160Hz and optimal low freq response at 1600 Hz. IOW this cap cut low freq. 0.1 uF is good for 100K impedance. For 10K 1 or 2 uF is needed. _________________ http://L-1.su |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
frequencycentral Kicking the shit out of your speakers
Joined: 31 Dec 2009 Last Visit: 19 Jun 2013
   Posts: 812 Location: Rick, FC>UK
| |
| Back to top |
|
 |
L-1 Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 14 Dec 2011 Last Visit: 19 Jun 2013
 Posts: 1175 Location: Belarus
| |
| Back to top |
|
 |
falafelbiels still learning to wiggle
Joined: 04 Aug 2009 Last Visit: 19 Jun 2013
   Posts: 2703 Location: Rotterdamn son
|
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 7:16 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| There's always something else... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dr. Sketch-n-Etch Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 21 Jan 2010 Last Visit: 19 Jun 2013
   Posts: 2639 Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 7:38 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Did you terminate the 4.7k resistors from the Darlington buffer outputs to -V or to ground? The symbols look a bit like ground symbols, but they are in fact the negative rails. Also, did you take the HP signal from the output of the inverter? The schematic is drawn kind of badly there, but the HP output must definitely be taken from the output of that inverter.
Other than that, there is no reason why this circuit should not give fairly robust outputs. (Incidentally, those three output buffers are not really required, since their input signals all come from buffers anyway, but since you will probably use a quad opamp here, there is no harm in using them, I suppose. In any case, they could simply be replaced with 1k output resistors, after the capacitors (which are definitely required).)
This is actually a pretty terrible circuit as drawn. Here are a few suggestions for improvement:
1) The LM13700 distorts really badly unless the differential inputs are limited to less than about 50 mV p-p. I have confirmed through simulation that this circuit, as drawn, will distort something terrible (and I'm not talking about good distortion -- I'm talking about shitty-looking and shitty-sounding output waveforms). This is VERY easily fixed. Replace the two 22k resistors with 100k, and the four 1k resistors with 220R. You could also replace the 4.7k resistors with 10k, but this is not really necessary.
2) The ac coupling caps are too small, and will filter signals near the bottom of the audio range. Replace with 470nF (at least).
3) Unless your input signal is expected to have a significant dc bias, you don't really need that input coupling cap, and it is going to filter your input signal fairly significantly unless it is much, much larger (like, 10uF nonpolar or two back-to-back 22uF aluminum electrolytics).
Of course, I'd only build an SVF with 2164 now (and my circuit self-oscillates quite nicely and gives very clean quadrature sine waves from all outputs), but this could be a tight little circuit with the correct component values.
Hope this helps.  _________________ Float your climb. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ultrashock Veteran Wiggler
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Last Visit: 18 Jun 2013
  Posts: 552 Location: Underhaven
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 9:28 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Dr. Sketch-n-Etch
original 2164 are hard to find. do you use them or Cool Audio clones? As I see, lots of Intellijel modules incorporate this chips (Dixie expoconverter, corgasmatron. HEX vca etc.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neutron7 Oldschool bleeper
Joined: 23 May 2010 Last Visit: 11 Jun 2013
   Posts: 824
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 11:34 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
look at the input of the first LM13700. it has a voltage divider consisting of the 22k and 1k resistors. then look at the output buffers. they are only unity gain buffers.
just change them to an amplifier and it ought to be fine.
there might be other signal losses or gains in the LM13700s and associated circuitry, so its best to measure the outputs before calculating how much gain you need. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dr. Sketch-n-Etch Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 21 Jan 2010 Last Visit: 19 Jun 2013
   Posts: 2639 Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 1:16 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| ultrashock wrote: | Dr. Sketch-n-Etch
original 2164 are hard to find. do you use them or Cool Audio clones? As I see, lots of Intellijel modules incorporate this chips (Dixie expoconverter, corgasmatron. HEX vca etc.) |
Only the clones. I use through-hole V2164D from Small Bear Electronics for my own personal 5U builds, and Intellijel uses surface-mount V2164M direct from Coolaudio for our eurorack modules. Every module I've designed or co-designed for Intellijel (including the new ones on the drawing board or in various stages of production right now) use this chip. _________________ Float your climb. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dr. Sketch-n-Etch Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 21 Jan 2010 Last Visit: 19 Jun 2013
   Posts: 2639 Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 1:37 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| Neutron7 wrote: | look at the input of the first LM13700. it has a voltage divider consisting of the 22k and 1k resistors. then look at the output buffers. they are only unity gain buffers.
just change them to an amplifier and it ought to be fine.
there might be other signal losses or gains in the LM13700s and associated circuitry, so its best to measure the outputs before calculating how much gain you need. |
Sorry Neutron7, but this is not the right way to think about OTAs. Unlike opamps, OTAs do not simply amplify voltages. An OTA converts a differential voltage to a current. Also, just like a differential transistor pair, a typical OTA will distort badly if the input differential voltage exceeds about 50 mV (indeed, at higher voltages, it becomes a sine shaper, and at very high voltages, a comparator). This distortion is easily overcome by applying a suitable bias current to the linearizing diodes found on pins 2 and 15, but folks hardly ever use them. Without them, the input differential voltage to an OTA is always very small, but the output current is determined by the current fed to the "amplifier bias current" inputs, I_abc (found at pins 1 and 16). No output amplifier is ever needed for an OTA, just a current-to-voltage converter. One needs only to supply sufficient current to the I_abc pin to get any level of gain desired. However, the I_abc current should never exceed 2mA or the chip will fry (indeed, it's a great idea to limit this current to 1mA). Also, it is important to realize that the I_abc pins ride at a voltage close to the negative rail; hence, positive voltages applied through a resistor determine the I_abc current.
Now, having said all that, your assessment here is actually doubly misguided (please don't take this the wrong way, I'm not trying to be a dick!) because we are not actually using the OTA as an amplifier here. In filters, the OTA is used as a voltage-controlled resistor to control the cutoff frequency -- basically, it constitutes the "R" in the "RC" network. The output amplitude in the SVF is actually fixed by the feedback resistors on the input inverter (the opamp on the far left), and this filter is designed for unity gain (i.e., 10k input and 10k feedback). In other words, the gains applied to the 13700s have no bearing whatsoever on the output amplitude (except insofar as they control the cutoff frequency of the filter, of course). It should also be noted that both OTAs should be fed the same I_abc current from a common exponential converter (another advantage of the 2164 is that it is already exponential and thus only requires a control voltage). _________________ Float your climb. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
frequencycentral Kicking the shit out of your speakers
Joined: 31 Dec 2009 Last Visit: 19 Jun 2013
   Posts: 812 Location: Rick, FC>UK
| |
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
|