| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
WMD Triple Bipolar VCA - TBVCA & QAAF Video Added 10/26/ |
WMDevices Wiggling with Experience
Joined: 11 Aug 2009 Last Visit: 24 May 2013
   Posts: 349 Location: Denver, CO
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 2:20 pm Post subject: WMD Triple Bipolar VCA - TBVCA & QAAF Video Added 10/26/ |
 |
|
|
2012/10/25 EDIT: Just uploaded the below video. The TBVCAs have been shipped and are available immediately.
For the QAAF:
The expansion module for the PDO is finished and sounds great.
It consists of three individual bipolar (polarizing) linear VCAs. Each VCA has a bias control: Centered (0) is off, CW outputs non-inverted signal, CCW outputs inverted. The 2nd knob per VCA is a bipolar attenuator for CV control.
There is one output per channel, normaled to each phase input on the PDO.
Now, there are two inputs per channel. The one marked "+" is the normal input, and drives the input marked "-" through an inverter. Plugging into the "-" input produces a non-inverted signal on the CCW (or negative CV) direction, turning the VCA into a cross-fader. Neither signal will be inverted in cross-fade mode.
An alternative to cross-fade mode is blend mode, where the two signals would be blended without a dead center. This requires two resistors to be set at the factory per VCA. Unfortunately there was absolutely no room left on the PCB for switches for this functionality.
Please give me your feedback on how you'd like blend or crossfade to be on the final module. Options are: 1. All Crossfade, 2. All Blend, 3. one channel of one, two of the other.
Let me know what you would like to come stock. I'm leaning towards two crossfade and the bottom be blend.
There is also a MIX output of all 3 VCAs.
Additional specs are 8 HP, skiffable with a depth of about 24mm. Power consumption of about 90mA on both rails.
It was intended to be the PDO expansion, but I think a lot of wigglers can use this standalone.
We expect availability to be 3-5 weeks.
-William Mathewson / WMD

Last edited by WMDevices on Fri Oct 26, 2012 4:40 pm; edited 4 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Al Common Wiggler
Joined: 21 Jun 2012 Last Visit: 24 May 2013 Posts: 84 Location: Illinois, USA
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 3:04 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Looks great!
When used exclusively as a PDO expansion, would the crossfade/blend feature not apply? I ask because it seems that using the expansion jacks on the back of the PDO normals the signals to the expansion module. Does this make sense? I think you've explained it very well, I'm trying to wrap my head around it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NV Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 08 Jul 2008 Last Visit: 24 May 2013
    Posts: 2017
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 3:04 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Great idea for a module, and a perfect expansion for the PDO. Bipolar VCAs are immensely handy - having a mix and crossfade within makes them even more so.
As for the options, personally I would choose 1. All Crossfade. Being able to crossfade between the signals sounds much more interesting and useful to me than a basic blending, and there are plenty of places in a modular where you can blend signals but generally not many where you can crossfade. Plus the crossfading sounds like it would yield some very interesting results when normalled to the PDO. Plus with the normalling I think having two different options would just confuse things - as a standalone module not so much, but normalled to the PDO I'd prefer them all the same. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mitchk1989 *Probably* not a cyborg.
Joined: 02 Jan 2011 Last Visit: 24 May 2013
  Posts: 2110 Location: Halifax, NS
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 3:53 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
So the options are A -> silence -> B (which you refer to as 'crossfade'?) or A -> B (which you refer to as 'blend')... I would take all 'blend' if so, as long as that doesn't fuck up it's use as a 'polarizing VCA'.
Also wouldn't audio rate modulation with a 'polarizing VCA' be ring mod? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blinosynth Common Wiggler
Joined: 17 Mar 2011 Last Visit: 23 May 2013
  Posts: 212 Location: italy
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 4:09 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
the pdo vco is one my next purchaise, now with this expander !
i also say option 1 : crossfade
a video with pdo and this expander would be perfect! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mitchk1989 *Probably* not a cyborg.
Joined: 02 Jan 2011 Last Visit: 24 May 2013
  Posts: 2110 Location: Halifax, NS
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 4:27 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| can someone explain to me why you'd want the silence at center? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NV Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 08 Jul 2008 Last Visit: 24 May 2013
    Posts: 2017
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:25 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| Mitchk1989 wrote: | | can someone explain to me why you'd want the silence at center? |
I didn't initially interpret WMD's post as having a dead point in the center for crossfading, although I can see where that's implied now. The definition of crossfade is that one source fades in while another fades out, which means there is no dead point but at worse a dip in output at the center crossing.
Actual crossfading I find very appealing, and now after re-reading the post I'm thinking maybe what he terms as "blend" is in effect crossfading. I guess some clarification would be nice. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WMDevices Wiggling with Experience
Joined: 11 Aug 2009 Last Visit: 24 May 2013
   Posts: 349 Location: Denver, CO
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:25 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| Quote: | | When used exclusively as a PDO expansion, would the crossfade/blend feature not apply? I ask because it seems that using the expansion jacks on the back of the PDO normals the signals to the expansion module. Does this make sense? I think you've explained it very well, I'm trying to wrap my head around it. |
It would still apply. The crossfade/blend issue becomes irrelevant when only one input is used because it will be bipolar/polarizing either way. It's only with regard to the handling of both inputs when they are different signals.
The normaling from the PDO to the expansion is as follows:
PDO Output 1 -> TBVCA Top "+" Input. TBVCA Top Out -> PDO Phase In 2.
PDO Output 2 -> TBVCA Middle "+" Input. TBVCA Middle Out -> PDO Phase In 3.
PDO Output 3 -> TBVCA Bottom "+" Input. TBVCA Bottom Out -> PDO Phase In 4.
| Quote: | | can someone explain to me why you'd want the silence at center? |
Silence in the center = VCA off. + CV in = Positive Output. - CV in = Negative Output. Therefore with CV modulating the PDO phase inputs, with a 0V CV controlling the VCA, there will be no phase modulation. Positive CV = Positive modulation, Negative CV = Negative modulation.
Blend won't mess up the bipolar aspect of the VCA.
However, if you want to fade between types of modulation, for example sine and triangle on both inputs of a VCA section, crossfade would give you a dead zone where there is no modulation. Blend would not give you that dead zone, rather changing the modulation type smoothly. Thats why there's the dilemma, because both are useful.
| Quote: | | Plus with the normalling I think having two different options would just confuse things - as a standalone module not so much, but normalled to the PDO I'd prefer them all the same. |
I agree, even if the differences were silkscreened on the panel, different behavior would lead to less intuitive patching.
I will probably default to all crossfade, and will make a few with all blend option, that way you can take your pick when you order. They can always be changed back at my shop for the cost of shipping.
As far as pricing, I am shooting at $229. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WMDevices Wiggling with Experience
Joined: 11 Aug 2009 Last Visit: 24 May 2013
   Posts: 349 Location: Denver, CO
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:30 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| I don't know that there are tight definitions. Cross fade to me is fade-out -> 0 -> fade in. Blend is fade into each other without drop in level. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NV Super Deluxe Wiggler
Joined: 08 Jul 2008 Last Visit: 24 May 2013
    Posts: 2017
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:45 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| WMDevices wrote: |
Silence in the center = VCA off. + CV in = Positive Output. - CV in = Negative Output. Therefore with CV modulating the PDO phase inputs, with a 0V CV controlling the VCA, there will be no phase modulation. Positive CV = Positive modulation, Negative CV = Negative modulation.
Blend won't mess up the bipolar aspect of the VCA.
However, if you want to fade between types of modulation, for example sine and triangle on both inputs of a VCA section, crossfade would give you a dead zone where there is no modulation. Blend would not give you that dead zone, rather changing the modulation type smoothly. Thats why there's the dilemma, because both are useful. |
Given this, I would probably change my answer to "Blend." Having a zero point in the VCA is absolutely useful for PM/FM modulation, in which case only using the + input would work. While I can think of some interesting uses for having the two halves of the VCA functioning upon different signals, I think having the ability to smoothly interpolate between two signals would see much more benefit for most users, particularly those who are more into the drone aspect. The additional benefits could be seen not only within the PDO's normalization, but also throughout the rest of the system.
Having the option to crossfade between two signals by running another signal into the - input introduces a huge amount of capability to your module to function as a crossfader throughout the rest of a system, which in effect turns your bipolar VCAs into a 2-in-1 module. There's a market for crossfaders with Malekko's Fade module and J3RK's recent DIY Crossfade, and I imagine people would view it as quite a benefit to have it included in an already useful bipolar VCA module.
I do believe that your explanation for "Crossfade" is more like a bipolar fade, whereas "Blend" is more correctly termed as crossfading. Not trying to seem pretentious, but it is a defined term within audio engineering as fading one signal out while simultaneously fading the other in.
Also a quick question - with the VCAs normaled to the PDO, would they be connected via switched contacts so that you could insert an external signal into the VCA or use it as an isolated VCA by plugging into the output even when connected to the PDO via headers in the back? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WMDevices Wiggling with Experience
Joined: 11 Aug 2009 Last Visit: 24 May 2013
   Posts: 349 Location: Denver, CO
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 6:15 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| Quote: | | I do believe that your explanation for "Crossfade" is more like a bipolar fade, whereas "Blend" is more correctly termed as crossfading. Not trying to seem pretentious, but it is a defined term within audio engineering as fading one signal out while simultaneously fading the other in. |
Yeah I looked it up after posting, and I believe now that blend = crossfade. I can't find a term for fading out and back in between two signals.
| Quote: | | Also a quick question - with the VCAs normaled to the PDO, would they be connected via switched contacts so that you could insert an external signal into the VCA or use it as an isolated VCA by plugging into the output even when connected to the PDO via headers in the back? |
The Phase inputs on the PDO will break the normal to the input. The + Input to the TBVCA will break the normal to its input. Outputs will not have their normals broken by plugging in. This was a double-edged sword, and I decided that since there is an attenuator on the PDO that you could dial out the VCA's output so that the VCA can be used in isolation. This way you can use the affected signal at the PDO and simultaneously somewhere else.
-William Mathewson / WMD |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
boramx lepidopteran orgasm
Joined: 20 Mar 2010 Last Visit: 24 May 2013
   Posts: 1451 Location: Infant Island
| |
| Back to top |
|
 |
Al Common Wiggler
Joined: 21 Jun 2012 Last Visit: 24 May 2013 Posts: 84 Location: Illinois, USA
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 6:31 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| Quote: |
Given this, I would probably change my answer to "Blend." Having a zero point in the VCA is absolutely useful for PM/FM modulation, in which case only using the + input would work. While I can think of some interesting uses for having the two halves of the VCA functioning upon different signals, I think having the ability to smoothly interpolate between two signals would see much more benefit for most users, particularly those who are more into the drone aspect. The additional benefits could be seen not only within the PDO's normalization, but also throughout the rest of the system. |
I agree with this. I'll be grabbing this module as soon as I can. There's an 8hp hole waiting for it right next to my PDO. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
demonamination Common Wiggler
Joined: 02 Feb 2012 Last Visit: 18 Apr 2013
 Posts: 54 Location: box
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 6:50 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
That's a very cool new ^^ I love my PDO, that's an incredible module, very powerfull, but I've currently not enough VCAs (!) to explore the fifth dimension with him, so, thank for this release...
It's hard to choose between the two options !
Personnally I' prefer the blend option that give you -for what I've understood- the possibility to have 3 sort of "mini-mixer" for each pair of signals inputs, with smooth transition capabilities... (CCW= 100% In-, NOON= 50%In-, 50%In+, CW=100% In+, is that right ?) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bendedavis Ultra Wiggler
Joined: 07 Aug 2010 Last Visit: 24 May 2013
  Posts: 871 Location: Gastonia, NC
| |
| Back to top |
|
 |
WMDevices Wiggling with Experience
Joined: 11 Aug 2009 Last Visit: 24 May 2013
   Posts: 349 Location: Denver, CO
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 7:39 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| Quote: | | (CCW= 100% In-, NOON= 50%In-, 50%In+, CW=100% In+, is that right ?) |
That would be correct with blend mode.
So far, I will plan on doing some of both blend and silent center. But one thing for sure: all channels will be identical on the module.
Thanks for the feedback so far!
-William Mathewson / WMD |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Drumdrumdrumdrum What she said
Joined: 26 Jul 2011 Last Visit: 24 May 2013
 Posts: 2912 Location: Tropical Australia
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 11:17 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| boramx wrote: | uh, i'd buy this without having a PDO.
very nice feature set in 8hp. |
+1  _________________ "Modular synths can take your ego out of the equation – which, in music, is a blessing" - Jeremy Greenspan
Gear For Sale/Trade: http://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=83341 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DrBerndtHoffmann Wiggling with Experience
Joined: 01 Aug 2011 Last Visit: 24 May 2013
 Posts: 396 Location: London, UK
| |
| Back to top |
|
 |
oskies Common Wiggler
Joined: 04 Mar 2012 Last Visit: 18 May 2013
 Posts: 66 Location: Leiden
|
Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2012 1:47 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Blend (no deadzone), definitely  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blinosynth Common Wiggler
Joined: 17 Mar 2011 Last Visit: 23 May 2013
  Posts: 212 Location: italy
|
Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2012 1:48 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
if there is a dead point in the cente of crossfade i change my option
blend maybe is a better choise |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|