Some Chorus card demos?

Excuse me if this has been talked bout already

in preset loop mode you can play more than once a single preset,
i mean for example 2 time preset 1 then pass to preset 2 who play 4 times before go to preset 3 and so on

is that possible with CR?

thanks

i think, maybe better to wait for the 4ms sampler

damase wrote:Whoa. That new dixie looks great! Flip?

+1

Hollllly...God!!!

How About the piano sound of Telharmonic? can You explain how to achieve that?

What a beautiful piece!

Just want ask a question , how much is the signal coming out of the balanced version, attenuated? -6dB?

Can we at least know if it's a sound generator, a modifier/processor, or a modulator ?

Just Wonder can you achieve with the right clock speed the lo-fi-nes of the first 70's digital verb/delays?

just to know if it's any good as a mic ( dynamic ) pre-amplifier

just a quick question concering the normlization , just to know if you patch a signal in the input 1 and get the output from channel 2 ( bottom ) you'd get summed slopes response 6db +12db, or not ?

KONTAKT1968 wrote:LP, HP ,AP I wonder if it is something like the abandoned expander for the dr oct 2 for pole mixing??

Would be too cool

oootini wrote:

dc_Sux wrote:Under the Mode button, it looks like next to the LEDs it reads LP, HP, AP top to bottom.
Looks like whatever it is incorporates a multimode filter.
AP? Phase modulation?

All pass? A switching filter before a s/h would be cool for shaping the input to the s/h.

A Switched Capacitor Filter?

What about Impedance matching? ( for guitars and basses )

donttouchmyrice wrote:When will it be available in europe?

+1

crystal hell pool wrote:guess the final version has been done and production is begging, the panel appears to just be black and white. sick

where you have seen that?

F@ck YOU

Why digital delay? and not BBD one?

i think a bbd fits well...after springray

or juno 6 chorus module, fits better with our philosophy, i think

and would be amazing of course

What???

pretty impressive!

bidirectional means it can be 4 inputs to one out and 1 input to 4 outs, right?

orangehexagon wrote:

sonicwarrior wrote:

EnricoGaruda wrote:the original version was in fact

the mark II in can assure it isn't

So the MK I is better?

Not better, but different.

MKII version allows for input soft clipping, where the MKI does not.

i've forgot to say that is an awesome filter and modulator

intellijel doctor octature II or I :tu: less expensive than the cwejman and it can also be a wicked octature LFO even has a fine tune control for playing melodic/tuned stuff :tu: the doc II is not temperature controlled.. They claim the original version I is temperature compensated and tracks volts...

intellijel doctor octature II or I :tu: less expensive than the cwejman and it can also be a wicked octature LFO even has a fine tune control for playing melodic/tuned stuff :tu: the doc II is not temperature controlled.. They claim the original version I is temperature compensated and tracks volts...