New Stand-Alone MPC
Moderators: Kent, luketeaford, Joe.
New Stand-Alone MPC
http://fr.m.audiofanzine.com/akai/mpc/f ... -live.html
Up for FCC approval. So it have wireless capabilities it seems. Vey intessting times we live in....
Up for FCC approval. So it have wireless capabilities it seems. Vey intessting times we live in....
https://fccid.io/pdf.php?id=3190872
Link to Owners Manual
Not too much info, just basicspecs, I/O and Functions. No real detail on operations.
Link to Owners Manual
Not too much info, just basicspecs, I/O and Functions. No real detail on operations.
- nearly ghost
- Veteran Wiggler
- Posts: 640
- Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 5:23 am
- Location: Malta
- Khyber Pass
- The Tank Abbot of home recording
- Posts: 216
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 8:47 am
- Location: Oslo
- Contact:
Oh wow. That's huge. Looks like just what I've been looking for. I know people hate on it but I'm pretty happy with my 5000. The touch display on this could be a HUGE benefit for chopping samples. Computer connectivity without complete reliance on a computer is a big benefit. I have mixed feelings about a smaller form factor. To me an MPC is supposed to be a behemoth. Hopefully they don't sacrifice pad quality. And hopefully they iron out the OS before release so this thing has a fighting chance. Only two MIDI out ports seems like a mistake to me but whatever, again a compromise for size. Only 4 audio outs aside from the main outs. No ADAT for audio. It means something about USB for MIDI and audio. So does that mean it can double as an audio interface? Also, I assume there's a phono preamp right? 2 GB RAM is nice, as is the built in HD with option to add SATA drive if desired. I hope they will keep the ability to stream 8 tracks of audio off the HD without having to load it into RAM. Didn't see specs on sample rate, file compatibility, etc. Bottom line, I find this very exciting. It could be a total disappointment but I'm glad they're listening to folks who don't want their sampler tied to their computer (I personally like having both options).
really interesting, been toying with the idea of getting an mpc to get away from the computer, but i've been hesitant because currently i use maschine and often times i still switch to the computer to edit stuff more quickly on a bigger, graphical screen. now this could be a good alternative. or it might cause NI to get off they chairs and make a maschine equivalent with vst(i) and all the good stuff.
- Paranormal Patroler
- Super Deluxe Wiggler
- Posts: 11196
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 3:40 pm
- Location: the Terminal beach
The hd inside is probably ssd.
Would have loved 8 out.
Hopefully we can make complete tracks in it.
We need akai not fucking this up.
And chances are small
We should make a petition to ask akai not to fuck this up haha
Would have loved 8 out.
Hopefully we can make complete tracks in it.
We need akai not fucking this up.
And chances are small

We should make a petition to ask akai not to fuck this up haha
Last edited by drowld on Mon Nov 14, 2016 1:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Paranormal Patroler
- Super Deluxe Wiggler
- Posts: 11196
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 3:40 pm
- Location: the Terminal beach
drowld wrote:The hd inside is probably ssd.
Would have loved 8 out.
Hopefully we can make complete tracks in it.

drowld wrote:We should make a petition to ask akai not to fuck this up haha

All rights reserved; all wrongs reversed.
Dude I'm crazy enough to think about putting my 5000 on the chopping block before prices drop. Ha I think it's just craziness and it will pass. But right now I feel the MPC is definitely getting under utilized because I can manage samples more easily/quickly in Ableton. I still can't bring myself to let it go because I love having an MPC in the studio and some days I just want to get away from the computer. If I had a hybrid unit that was capable of both it would really change my work flow.
Even if these are announced next week though, it'll be a while before we see them. And even longer before a stable OS is achieved im afraid. The other question I have is which form factor seems more appealing to me. There is certain appeal to a small unit with a touch screen. I think I'd miss the knobs and sliders though. The price difference if remotely accurate seems pretty wide. It makes me wonder what the "flagship" will offer. Hopefully a built in VA synth is not the selling point like the 5000. Haha. The gearslut in me says get both without knowing any facts. Ha but I will say they'll have to fuck it up pretty bad to keep me from getting at least one of them. I do love my 5000 but the concept of a modern hardware MPC has me really interested. Hybrid is even better.
Even if these are announced next week though, it'll be a while before we see them. And even longer before a stable OS is achieved im afraid. The other question I have is which form factor seems more appealing to me. There is certain appeal to a small unit with a touch screen. I think I'd miss the knobs and sliders though. The price difference if remotely accurate seems pretty wide. It makes me wonder what the "flagship" will offer. Hopefully a built in VA synth is not the selling point like the 5000. Haha. The gearslut in me says get both without knowing any facts. Ha but I will say they'll have to fuck it up pretty bad to keep me from getting at least one of them. I do love my 5000 but the concept of a modern hardware MPC has me really interested. Hybrid is even better.
- vasculator
- Veteran Wiggler
- Posts: 748
- Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 1:39 pm
- Location: Pittsburgh
- bobbylandry
- Common Wiggler
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 2:16 pm
- Location: Chattanooga, TN / Cambridge, MA
- Contact:
If this this is right and has the MPC workflow with no major problems I'm completely in. The MPC1000 with the JJOS is how I think about electronic music but mine is slowly breaking down and I can't commit to the price of getting it fully updated so it hasn't been used much lately. As long as this new one lets me sample, do non-destructive edits, mute arrangements, and not break I might finally get my face out of the computer again.
Someone made a "complete track" comment above and had some rebuttal, and I can see both sides of that. An MPC for actually completing something has never worked for me, but I come from the rock band world and everything has to get recorded as its own track and mixed traditionally as a separate step anyway. The mix is a whole other performance for me so any shortcomings there won't put me off as much as it will for others. If it does get a lot of that part of the job done though, even better.
Someone made a "complete track" comment above and had some rebuttal, and I can see both sides of that. An MPC for actually completing something has never worked for me, but I come from the rock band world and everything has to get recorded as its own track and mixed traditionally as a separate step anyway. The mix is a whole other performance for me so any shortcomings there won't put me off as much as it will for others. If it does get a lot of that part of the job done though, even better.
-
- Learning to Wiggle
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 2:45 am
- Location: US
This is it right here.CF3 wrote:Now, will I buy one? They're gonna have to work for it...... Impress me.
It's also amusing to me that they went all in on the Maschine/Push/computer controller bandwagon for a generation and tried to create their own computer software. Then suddenly they realized that everyone was going in the opposite direction with standalone stuff for live sets and things.
Totally agree. I hope the guy who writes JJOS gets hired somewhere for one of these sampling boxes.oaklandzzzoo wrote:They should hire dude from JJOS to do the firmware, and get a really really good translator to help with the manual.
-
- Wiggling with Experience
- Posts: 349
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2012 10:47 pm