[video][/video]
[video][/video]



Moderators: Kent, luketeaford, Joe., lisa, daverj
Any development on the above, namely the expander???jbartee wrote:We're hoping to add an optional 480i CVBS output mode to the World Core via a firmware update at some point down the road, which would make it TBC compatible. And obviously the expander, further down the road, would make integration much simpler.
It's still on the books, I was just discussing it with Liz a couple days ago actually.monads wrote:Any development on the above, namely the expander???jbartee wrote:We're hoping to add an optional 480i CVBS output mode to the World Core via a firmware update at some point down the road, which would make it TBC compatible. And obviously the expander, further down the road, would make integration much simpler.
That is one amazing chip! I came to this part of the forum to mention it after discovering it yesterday. Long live the Basic Stamp. (oops my age is showing!)daverj wrote:It uses a "Propeller" CPU from Parallax, which is basically a multi-core chip with 8 PIC clones in it.brent wrote:Unreal. It looks like a fairly slender panel too. Is this just the magic of Arduino or something? Impressive regardless. I love how they've got a Commodore monitor in that one pic.
6mos later, any update progress on LZX compatibility or interfacing options??? Still curious about this.jbartee wrote:It's still on the books, I was just discussing it with Liz a couple days ago actually.monads wrote:Any development on the above, namely the expander???jbartee wrote:We're hoping to add an optional 480i CVBS output mode to the World Core via a firmware update at some point down the road, which would make it TBC compatible. And obviously the expander, further down the road, would make integration much simpler.
We've both been really busy pushing through our production cycles (Liz with visual cortex and me finishing up Ming Mecca shipments) but it looks like there will be some time to dedicate to this soon.
Liz is taking the lead on it since she knows way more about analog video than I do. It will probably be released as an LZX module.
3rd'dmonads wrote:
6mos later, any update progress on LZX compatibility or interfacing options??? Still curious about this.
Well for those wondering....I tried the Ambery device and while it locks to Ming Mecca I can't get the Visual Cortex to lock to it. The image doesn't even display correctly so I wouldn't recommend anyone try. Another connection that's not compatible is connecting Ming Mecca directly to the Dave Jones MVIP. The image will display correctly, but it scrolls vertically. No lock.jbartee wrote:I'm pretty confidant that the converters I'm testing are going to work. One is the Ambery composite to component converter. It can be a little fiddley, requiring disconnecting and reconnecting the composite video input 2 or 3 times when it first powers on before it will lock onto the Ming Mecca sync correctly, but once it locks it's rock solid 240p to 480i conversion and surprisingly high quality for such a cheap box. Just need to get the Visual Cortex in to make absolutely sure it's output is compatible with the module.
Woahhhhh friend, that is intense. I'm sorry you had to deal with that spiral, becomes so addictive!monads wrote:Well for those wondering....I tried the Ambery device and while it locks to Ming Mecca I can't get the Visual Cortex to lock to it. The image doesn't even display correctly so I wouldn't recommend anyone try. Another connection that's not compatible is connecting Ming Mecca directly to the Dave Jones MVIP. The image will display correctly, but it scrolls vertically. No lock.jbartee wrote:I'm pretty confidant that the converters I'm testing are going to work. One is the Ambery composite to component converter. It can be a little fiddley, requiring disconnecting and reconnecting the composite video input 2 or 3 times when it first powers on before it will lock onto the Ming Mecca sync correctly, but once it locks it's rock solid 240p to 480i conversion and surprisingly high quality for such a cheap box. Just need to get the Visual Cortex in to make absolutely sure it's output is compatible with the module.
Besides trying the mentioned Panasonic DMR-E85H DVD/hard disk recorder by spacenoodle, and without an expander module and/or firmware update...I'm thinking the last resort is to record Ming Mecca, save the video and use the HD Player module connected to the TBC which is then connected to the Visual Cortex for proper sync. I really don't want a bulky DVD/hard disk recorder for this to work.
Anyhow, I just thought I'd share my experiments to save time for others and not waste money on the Ambery device specifically for trying to sync Ming Mecca to Ambery to Visual Cortex.
Used Broadcast TBCs can be had for ~$50 on eBay. If you were a little closer I'd swing one over to test with.monads wrote:I didn't try since I don't own any of these types of devices. These can be expensive options! One of the cheapest external units I found was the AV Toolbox AVT-8710 at $200-230.eth wrote:Did you try a broadcast/rackmount/external time base corrector? Curious if this worked for you.
monads wrote:I didn't try since I don't own any of these types of devices. These can be expensive options! One of the cheapest external units I found was the AV Toolbox AVT-8710 at $200-230.eth wrote:Did you try a broadcast/rackmount/external time base corrector? Curious if this worked for you.
I went ahead and tried as spacenoodle, but with a lower version model; Panasonic DMR-E80H DVD/hard disk recorderspacenoodle wrote:I've got it working with a Panasonic DMR-E85H DVD/hard disk recorder. The output is 480i component. Conveniently, it just passes the converted signal through when it's on. This will also work with a Philips DVDR-985, although they are considerably less reliable and more bulky than the Panasonic.