Reducing quantization "warble"
- antonriehl
- Common Wiggler
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2018 2:02 pm
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
Reducing quantization "warble"
I love using my uTune, and it's one of the modules in 3/4 of the patches I make, but sometimes I get this "warble" (I don't know a better word) where the incoming CV seems to be close enough to two different notes, or fluctuates enough, that it trills between two different notes. I'm curious if people have ways to reduce this effect, or if there are other ways to stabilize CV going to the input? I have heard it happen on other systems before, but I feel like I hear it more in my system than in other people's.
Just for some background, I have 1 expander, and am running the current version of the firmware. I will typically take a random source, and run it through an attenuator/verter, usually with an offset of some kind (it has been A*B+C lately), and then into uTune.
Just for some background, I have 1 expander, and am running the current version of the firmware. I will typically take a random source, and run it through an attenuator/verter, usually with an offset of some kind (it has been A*B+C lately), and then into uTune.
Receiver 2 Meditations: https://bandcamp.antonriehl.com/album/r ... soundtrack
Receiver II Soundtrack: https://bandcamp.antonriehl.com/album/r ... soundtrack
My other music: https://songwhip.com/artist/h-anton-riehl
Receiver II Soundtrack: https://bandcamp.antonriehl.com/album/r ... soundtrack
My other music: https://songwhip.com/artist/h-anton-riehl
Re: Reducing quantization "warble"
Hi, I can not tell you of course if your amount of warble is typical or not. It is always introduces by a fluctuating CV. µTune actually uses hysteresis around the quantisation steps to reduce warble but of course there is a limit to this. As soon as the fluctuations are in the range of half a semitone you will hear them.
https://tubbutec.de
https://www.facebook.com/tubbu.tec
https://www.youtube.com/user/tubbutec/videos
mail(ät)tubbutec(döt)de
Public key: http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&se ... 74E42FB26A
https://www.facebook.com/tubbu.tec
https://www.youtube.com/user/tubbutec/videos
mail(ät)tubbutec(döt)de
Public key: http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&se ... 74E42FB26A
- BananaPlug
- Super Deluxe Wiggler
- Posts: 2764
- Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:37 pm
- Location: PHL USA
Re: Reducing quantization "warble"
To allow the settling time you can put a short gate delay ahead of the envelope generator's trigger. This may lead you to other complications depending on how precise your timing must be and whether you can shift it in post-production.

Re: Reducing quantization "warble"
Such a trigger delay is built into µTune ! When using triggered or gated quantization it is active and you can adjust its length as well
https://tubbutec.de
https://www.facebook.com/tubbu.tec
https://www.youtube.com/user/tubbutec/videos
mail(ät)tubbutec(döt)de
Public key: http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&se ... 74E42FB26A
https://www.facebook.com/tubbu.tec
https://www.youtube.com/user/tubbutec/videos
mail(ät)tubbutec(döt)de
Public key: http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&se ... 74E42FB26A
- antonriehl
- Common Wiggler
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2018 2:02 pm
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
Re: Reducing quantization "warble"
Thanks, your replies all make sense, and I knew there wouldn't be a "simple" answer to address this. Just thought I'd see if there were any other tricks. It's one of those things that is so strange because sometimes it happens a lot, and other times you don't even notice it. I think it is probably something I can overcome more with practice, and timing gates/clocks.
Receiver 2 Meditations: https://bandcamp.antonriehl.com/album/r ... soundtrack
Receiver II Soundtrack: https://bandcamp.antonriehl.com/album/r ... soundtrack
My other music: https://songwhip.com/artist/h-anton-riehl
Receiver II Soundtrack: https://bandcamp.antonriehl.com/album/r ... soundtrack
My other music: https://songwhip.com/artist/h-anton-riehl
Re: Reducing quantization "warble"
Depending on your CV sources and how stable they react to power supply fluctuations, it might be your power supply.
https://tubbutec.de
https://www.facebook.com/tubbu.tec
https://www.youtube.com/user/tubbutec/videos
mail(ät)tubbutec(döt)de
Public key: http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&se ... 74E42FB26A
https://www.facebook.com/tubbu.tec
https://www.youtube.com/user/tubbutec/videos
mail(ät)tubbutec(döt)de
Public key: http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&se ... 74E42FB26A
- antonriehl
- Common Wiggler
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2018 2:02 pm
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
Re: Reducing quantization "warble"
It seems to happen regardless of what cv source I’m using, but I haven’t done a lot of specific tests to see. It does seem to happen more at higher voltages than at lower ones. But, that is currently purely anecdotal.
Receiver 2 Meditations: https://bandcamp.antonriehl.com/album/r ... soundtrack
Receiver II Soundtrack: https://bandcamp.antonriehl.com/album/r ... soundtrack
My other music: https://songwhip.com/artist/h-anton-riehl
Receiver II Soundtrack: https://bandcamp.antonriehl.com/album/r ... soundtrack
My other music: https://songwhip.com/artist/h-anton-riehl
Re: Reducing quantization "warble"
Do you have a scope available?
- antonriehl
- Common Wiggler
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2018 2:02 pm
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
Re: Reducing quantization "warble"
I do not at the moment. (Although I could use the one in VCV rack… so kinda?)
Receiver 2 Meditations: https://bandcamp.antonriehl.com/album/r ... soundtrack
Receiver II Soundtrack: https://bandcamp.antonriehl.com/album/r ... soundtrack
My other music: https://songwhip.com/artist/h-anton-riehl
Receiver II Soundtrack: https://bandcamp.antonriehl.com/album/r ... soundtrack
My other music: https://songwhip.com/artist/h-anton-riehl
Re: Reducing quantization "warble"
can you recommend where I might learn more about using "hysteresis around the quantisation steps to reduce warble"?
Re: Reducing quantization "warble"
There is nothing you can change about the hysteresis, it is built into µTune's input algorythm.
But if you do want to know:
It is explained here:
https://electronics.stackexchange.com/q ... hysteresis
Only difference in µTune is, that you have multiple hysteresis bands, one for each possible input voltage. So if you have a scaling of 12notes / V at the input, µTune will use 12 bands / V
But if you do want to know:
It is explained here:
https://electronics.stackexchange.com/q ... hysteresis
Only difference in µTune is, that you have multiple hysteresis bands, one for each possible input voltage. So if you have a scaling of 12notes / V at the input, µTune will use 12 bands / V
https://tubbutec.de
https://www.facebook.com/tubbu.tec
https://www.youtube.com/user/tubbutec/videos
mail(ät)tubbutec(döt)de
Public key: http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&se ... 74E42FB26A
https://www.facebook.com/tubbu.tec
https://www.youtube.com/user/tubbutec/videos
mail(ät)tubbutec(döt)de
Public key: http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&se ... 74E42FB26A