phasing ala Steve
Moderators: Kent, lisa, luketeaford, Joe.
- propertyof
- Wiggling with Experience
- Posts: 324
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 7:58 pm
phasing ala Steve
i'm big fan of Steve Reich and been listening to his early records again recently.
makes me wonder, i want to recreate something like his phase patterns minimalism. i'm sure it's possible in eurorack, but not sure which modules & what kind of modules needed for the process.
i found out a couple of module could do an instant Reich like the Orthogonal Devices ER-101. but i still have vague ideas how to translate it & recreate it in usual system. i'm really curious.
so basically you'll need a sequencer? or two? do we need a specific sequencer?
clock it slightly different?
which combination of module that would be perfect here?
need your enlightenment here please..
thank you.
makes me wonder, i want to recreate something like his phase patterns minimalism. i'm sure it's possible in eurorack, but not sure which modules & what kind of modules needed for the process.
i found out a couple of module could do an instant Reich like the Orthogonal Devices ER-101. but i still have vague ideas how to translate it & recreate it in usual system. i'm really curious.
so basically you'll need a sequencer? or two? do we need a specific sequencer?
clock it slightly different?
which combination of module that would be perfect here?
need your enlightenment here please..
thank you.
One way to do it would be have two sequencers, two voices (osc/vca/vcf etc) and two clock sources like a square wave LFO with sync.propertyof wrote:so basically you'll need a sequencer? or two? do we need a specific sequencer?
clock it slightly different?
which combination of module that would be perfect here?
need your enlightenment here please..
thank you.
Set both sequencers to the same notes. Connect your two voices to the two sequencers. Set your clock LFOs to nearly the same frequency but one very slightly lower than the other. To start the piece you would send a reset trigger to both sequencers and the sync on both LFOs.
The result would be the two sequencers playing the same notes, but slowly slipping out of time with respect to each other. The closer in frequency the clocking LFOs are to each other, the longer it will take for the two sequences to slip out of time.
- propertyof
- Wiggling with Experience
- Posts: 324
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 7:58 pm
- Paranormal Patroler
- Super Deluxe Wiggler
- Posts: 11156
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 3:40 pm
- Location: the Terminal beach
- anarchy4bits
- Wiggling with Experience
- Posts: 438
- Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 4:23 pm
- Location: Germany
- propertyof
- Wiggling with Experience
- Posts: 324
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 7:58 pm
you mean the ADDAC403? yeah, but i think they have not release it yet (will they?).Paranormal Patroler wrote:There is an ADDAC clock module which is designed with the idea of phasing in mind. You should look it up.
been more than a year i guess since they announced it, but still no clue about it, except only in their website.
- propertyof
- Wiggling with Experience
- Posts: 324
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 7:58 pm
interesting. will do more research on teletype.grimley wrote:Teletype. See third post from bottom here:
viewtopic.php?t=139302&postdays=0&posto ... &start=125
I don't have Maths but you could probably do it with one. Cycling mode, EOC outs to sequencer clock inputs. Sync trigger into whatever restarts the Maths cycle. Tough part would probably be setting the attack/decay/lin-exp knobs to similiar enough settings. Doepfer A-147 would also do it. Eowave Zone BF would be a cheap dual LFO with reset inputs as well.propertyof wrote:which clock modules that have sync function?
can i do it with both channel 1 & 4 of Maths?
- propertyof
- Wiggling with Experience
- Posts: 324
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 7:58 pm
- brandonlogic
- Super Deluxe Wiggler
- Posts: 2882
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2015 9:17 am
- Location: Milwaukee WI
any two clock sources/lfos and any two sequencers is all you need.
i did this with the pams workout as one clock source and disting's lfo as another. separated them by about 1bpm. q bit octone and turing machine are the sequencers.
[soundcloud url="https://api.soundcloud.com/tracks/257873631" params="color=ff5500&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false" width="100%" height="166" iframe="true" /]
i did this with the pams workout as one clock source and disting's lfo as another. separated them by about 1bpm. q bit octone and turing machine are the sequencers.
[soundcloud url="https://api.soundcloud.com/tracks/257873631" params="color=ff5500&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false" width="100%" height="166" iframe="true" /]
- sempervirent
- Super Deluxe Wiggler
- Posts: 4392
- Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 4:40 pm
- Location: Republic of Cascadia
- Contact:
To make a shameless plug, the new alternate firmare for Algorhythm will do 8x 8-step channels of trigger sequencing (or 4x16, or 2x32) with arbitrary sequence lengths for each pattern.
Doing polyrhythms ala Reich was one of the main motivations for the update (hence the name "Polyrhythm" for this version of the code) and I'm looking forward to doing some demos that show this type of usage.
Doing polyrhythms ala Reich was one of the main motivations for the update (hence the name "Polyrhythm" for this version of the code) and I'm looking forward to doing some demos that show this type of usage.
- propertyof
- Wiggling with Experience
- Posts: 324
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 7:58 pm
thanks for sharing the soundcloud links guys, these are inspiring.
sempervirent
looks interesting! yes please, please do it, looking forward to see it. i'm in the middle of deciding to grab a sequencer which still has performative elements, but if possible having that kind of function is such a bonus for sure.
sempervirent
looks interesting! yes please, please do it, looking forward to see it. i'm in the middle of deciding to grab a sequencer which still has performative elements, but if possible having that kind of function is such a bonus for sure.
- propertyof
- Wiggling with Experience
- Posts: 324
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 7:58 pm
I've just tried this with Maths and got pretty close.
Using a multed gate trigger both cycles at once (actually I use the gate from the LP1 Lightplane and keep it on); set fall time on both channels at zero (this makes EOR and EOC the same), set rise at 12 o'clock for both, the log/exponential knob as similar as possible, then adjust a setting that makes one envelop slightly longer than the other.
Then you get two sets of gates that start at the same time but slow drift apart.
What was mentioned earlier in this thread is true, it's not easy to get the right settings so they drift apart (and then back together) at a Reich like speed.
There's talk of changing the sequence lengths above as a solution. I might be wrong, but I think the phased effect is due to slightly different tempos as opposed to different sequence lengths but the same tempo.
Using a multed gate trigger both cycles at once (actually I use the gate from the LP1 Lightplane and keep it on); set fall time on both channels at zero (this makes EOR and EOC the same), set rise at 12 o'clock for both, the log/exponential knob as similar as possible, then adjust a setting that makes one envelop slightly longer than the other.
Then you get two sets of gates that start at the same time but slow drift apart.
What was mentioned earlier in this thread is true, it's not easy to get the right settings so they drift apart (and then back together) at a Reich like speed.
There's talk of changing the sequence lengths above as a solution. I might be wrong, but I think the phased effect is due to slightly different tempos as opposed to different sequence lengths but the same tempo.
The difference is negligible if your sequence length can be controlled with a fine enough granularity. For example, in the ER-101 piano phase video, both sequences are played at the same tempo but one of the sequences is shorter by one clock pulse. Specifically, one sequence is (12 notes)*(32 ppqn) = 384 clock pulses long and the other is 383 clock pulses long.BillyB909 wrote:(snip)
There's talk of changing the sequence lengths above as a solution. I might be wrong, but I think the phased effect is due to slightly different tempos as opposed to different sequence lengths but the same tempo.
I believe that a human performance also tends to use the "shorten one or two notes" approach rather than trying to have two tempos.
- propertyof
- Wiggling with Experience
- Posts: 324
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 7:58 pm
well according to...akrylik wrote:The difference is negligible if your sequence length can be controlled with a fine enough granularity. For example, in the ER-101 piano phase video, both sequences are played at the same tempo but one of the sequences is shorter by one clock pulse. Specifically, one sequence is (12 notes)*(32 ppqn) = 384 clock pulses long and the other is 383 clock pulses long.BillyB909 wrote:(snip)
There's talk of changing the sequence lengths above as a solution. I might be wrong, but I think the phased effect is due to slightly different tempos as opposed to different sequence lengths but the same tempo.
I believe that a human performance also tends to use the "shorten one or two notes" approach rather than trying to have two tempos.
so, i think by shorten the notes, it automatically will create a slightly different tempo.wikipedia wrote:"Phasing is a compositional technique in which the same part (a repetitive phrase) is played on two musical instruments, in steady but not identical tempi. Thus, the two instruments gradually shift out of unison, creating first a slight echo as one instrument plays a little behind the other, then a doubling with each note heard twice, then a complex ringing effect, and eventually coming back through doubling and echo into unison."
.
oh looks interesting! i'm in the middle of searching for a clock module. stuck between RCD or the new Pam, but this will be in my option list too now.
